Volume 30, Issue 3 (10-2024)
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2024, 30(3): 294-311 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Najafgholinejad A. Usability of the Management System of Public Libraries of Iran (SAMAN) from the perspective of Visually Impaired Users. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2024; 30 (3) :294-311
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2520-en.html
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2520-en.html
Department of Data Science, Information, and Artificial Intelligence, National library and archives of I.R. Tehran, Iran , najafgholinezhad@gmail.com
Abstract: (1296 Views)
Objective: The purpose of this research is to assess the usability of the management system of public libraries (Saman) from the perspective of visually impaired users.
Method: The research was applied a formal usability testing. The usability of the system was evaluated through exploratory observation of users with visual impairments (think-aloud protocol) by defining three real tasks. 10 users were selected by purposeful sampling method. Task completion was monitored using screen recording software. Data analysis was conducted using Excel and MAXQDA. Guba and Lincoln's criteria were employed to ensure data credibility.
Results: On average, each user spent approximately 30.9 minutes locating a resource, over 11 minutes for electronic membership requests, and about 7 minutes for sending inquiries to librarians. Few users were able to navigate the system without assistance, and some users were unsuccessful in completing their tasks. Ninety percent of users rated the ease of use of the system as poor and expressed dissatisfaction with the time spent on task completion. Key usability barriers were identified across 177 codes and five categories. The most frequent barriers included accessibility of combo boxes or dropdown menus, proper design, keyboard accessibility, logical heading structure, search complexity, system messages, and conveying information with senses.
Conclusions: Usability is a fundamental condition for the sustained performance of websites. Libraries and inclusive websites focus on diverse stakeholders. Engaging real end-users is a vital aspect of user-centered design, highlighting the need for continuous assessment of their expectations.
Method: The research was applied a formal usability testing. The usability of the system was evaluated through exploratory observation of users with visual impairments (think-aloud protocol) by defining three real tasks. 10 users were selected by purposeful sampling method. Task completion was monitored using screen recording software. Data analysis was conducted using Excel and MAXQDA. Guba and Lincoln's criteria were employed to ensure data credibility.
Results: On average, each user spent approximately 30.9 minutes locating a resource, over 11 minutes for electronic membership requests, and about 7 minutes for sending inquiries to librarians. Few users were able to navigate the system without assistance, and some users were unsuccessful in completing their tasks. Ninety percent of users rated the ease of use of the system as poor and expressed dissatisfaction with the time spent on task completion. Key usability barriers were identified across 177 codes and five categories. The most frequent barriers included accessibility of combo boxes or dropdown menus, proper design, keyboard accessibility, logical heading structure, search complexity, system messages, and conveying information with senses.
Conclusions: Usability is a fundamental condition for the sustained performance of websites. Libraries and inclusive websites focus on diverse stakeholders. Engaging real end-users is a vital aspect of user-centered design, highlighting the need for continuous assessment of their expectations.
Keywords: Usability, public libraries, visually impaired users, blind people, public library management system, SAMAN
Type of Study: qualitative |
Subject:
Management and Evaluation of Libraries
Received: 2023/11/13 | Accepted: 2024/04/27 | Published: 2024/10/1
Received: 2023/11/13 | Accepted: 2024/04/27 | Published: 2024/10/1
References
1. Abbaszadeh, M., & Abbaszadeh, M. (2012). Validity and reliability in qualitative researches. Journal of Applied Sociology, 23(1), 19-34. [In Persian]
2. Abdnikoyipour, E. (2010). Agent-based Human-Computer Interaction for the Visually-Iimpaired Users. Master's Thesis of Amirkabir University of Technology (Polytechnic). [In Persian]
3. Craven, J., & Brophy, P. (2003). Non-Visual Access to the Digital Library (NOVA): The Use of the Digital Library Interfaces by Blind and Visually-Impaired People. Manchester Metropolitan University, Centre for Research in Library and Information Management.
4. Dickstein, R., & Mills, V. (2000). Usability testing at the University of Arizona Library: How to let the users in on the design. Information Technology and Libraries, 19(3), 144-151.
5. Irwin, B., & Silk, K. (2019). Changing stakeholder expectations of library value. Public Library Quarterly, 38(3), 320-330. [DOI:10.1080/01616846.2019.1571398]
6. Kiruki, B. W., & Mutula, S. M. (2021). Accessibility and usability of library websites to students with visual and physical dsiabilities in public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 11(2), 55-75.
7. Koller, D., Le Pouesard, M., & Rummens, J. A. (2018). Defining social inclusion for children with disabilities: A critical literature review. Children & Society, 32, 1-13. [DOI:10.1111/chso.12223]
8. Kous, K., Pušnik, M., Heričko, M., & Polančič, G. (2020). Usability evaluation of a library website with different end user groups. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(1), 75-90. [DOI:10.1177/0961000618773133]
9. Kulikauskienė, K., & Liukinevičienė, L. (2020). The theoretical model of an inclusive library for people with disabilities and its practical implementation. Izzivi Prihodnosti, 2, 79-101. [DOI:10.37886/ip.2020.005]
10. Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., & Malarkey, C. (2007). What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 22(3), 247-269. doi:10.1080/10447310709336964. [DOI:10.1080/10447310709336964]
11. Leporini, B., Andronico, P., & Buzzi, M. (2004, May). Designing search engine user interfaces for the visually impaired. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A). pp. 57-66. [DOI:10.1145/990657.990668]
12. Letter of Approval Regarding the Establishment of the Coordination Headquarters for the Adaptation of the Country (2015). Approved by the Research Center of the Islamic Council. Retrieved from: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/936758 [In Persian]
13. Manzoor, M., & Vimarlund, V. (2017). E-services for the social inclusion of people with disabilities: A literature review. Technology and Disability, 29(1-2), 15-33. [DOI:10.3233/TAD-170175]
14. Mulliken, A. (2018). Eighteen blind library users' experiences with library websites and search tools in US academic libraries: A qualitative study. Hunter, 411. Retrieved from: http://dspace.fudutsinma.edu.ng/xmlui/handle/123456789/1672 [DOI:10.31235/osf.io/vtnr9]
15. Najafgholinejad, A. (2023). Accessibility and usability of the user interface of library information retrieval systems based on the experience of visually-impaired users and presenting a model. Research Project, Employer: National Library and Archives of Iran [In Persian]
16. Racelis, A. (2018). Library services for the poor: Theoretical framework for library social responsibility. Pedagogical Research, 3(2), 06. [DOI:10.20897/pr/90831]
17. Sedighi, Z. (2015). Examining the User Interface Criteria of Digital Libraries in Providing Services to the Deaf and Visually-Impaired and Providing a Suggested Model. PhD Thesis of Islamic Azad University, Hamadan branch. [In Persian]
18. Shimomura, Y., Hvannberg, E. T., & Hafsteinsson, H. (2010). Accessibility of audio and tactile interfaces for young blind people performing everyday tasks. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9(4), 297-310. [DOI:10.1007/s10209-009-0183-y]
19. Siamian, H., Hassanzadeh, M., Nooshinfard, F., & Hariri, N. (2014). Information needs of visually impaired people and role of libraries in meeting them: A systematic review. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 25(2), 150-165. [In Persian]
20. Statistical Yearbook 2020 (2021). Compiled by Amir Mehrabi, Hamid Qolipour, & Parisa Tale. Tehran: Publication of the Welfare Organization. [In Persian]
21. Tabatabaee, A., Hasani P., Mortazavi H., & Tabatabaeichehr, M. (2013). Strategies to enhance rigor in qualitative research. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, 5(3), 663-670. [DOI:10.29252/jnkums.5.3.663 [In Persian]]
22. Tomlinson, S. M. (2016). Perceptions of accessibility and usability by blind or visually-impaired persons: A pilot study. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-4. [DOI:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301120]
23. Xie, I., Babu, R., Jeong, W., Joo, S., & Fuller, P. (2014). Blind users searching digital libraries: Types of help-seeking situations at the cognitive level. iConference 2014 Proceedings.
24. Yoon, K., Dols, R., Hulscher, L., & Newberry, T. (2016). An exploratory study of library website accessibility for visually-impaired users. Library & Information Science Research, 38(3), 250-258. [DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.006]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
