Volume 30, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2024, 30(1): 82-98 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahjou A, Noruzi A, Keramaty M, Salehi K. Engaging Students: The Power of School Libraries in the Digital Age. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2024; 30 (1) :82-98
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2503-en.html
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2503-en.html
Department of Information Science and Knowledge Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran , noruzi@ut.ac.ir
Abstract: (3266 Views)
Purpose: School libraries, as key centers in the learning process, face significant weaknesses in engaging and involving students. Consequently, many students distance from libraries, leading to a weak learning process and a decline in the quality of virtual education. The purpose of this research is to determine the role of school libraries in fostering student engagement within the context of virtual education.
Method: The approach of the current research is qualitative and its method is meta-synthesis. The research population consists of 95 articles about the role of school libraries in student engagement in the process of virtual education, which were published in reputable scientific journals between 2000 and 2023. The research sample includes 50 articles that were purposefully collected and selected based on thematic analysis. Data were collected from the qualitative analysis of the studied articles.
Findings: Data analysis identified six key roles for school libraries in enhancing student engagement: accessibility of content and tools, information consultation and reference services, teaching information and media literacy, professional development for teachers, teacher collaboration and communication, and integration of new technologies. These roles are associated with educational strategies that can foster student engagement. This study found that school librarians collaborate with classroom teachers to plan student homeworks and conduct collaborative teaching and assessment. Previous research has also highlighted the importance of cooperation between school librarians and teachers. Librarians can share their expertise in emerging technologies with teachers and, through their teaching partnerships, guide educators towards tools and platforms that can be effectively integrated into lessons. Moreover, effective professional development can empower teachers to become technology leaders. Regarding the tools, knowledge and support necessary for teachers in virtual education, educators can enhance their ability to apply skills and knowledge in emerging and advanced technologies. These technologies enable them to locate, evaluate and ethically use information. To strengthen the study, specific examples relevant to educational goals should be provided. On the one hand, the present study showed that content/technology, student and teacher are the three main elements of virtual education. On the other hand, engagement is the main goal of education in the 21st century. Educational engagement is the concept of active participation of students in the education process and an important factor in educational progress, which is associated with the emotional components of passion, motivation and energy. In other words, educational engagement is the quality of effort that students spend on purposeful educational activities that lead to improved learning achievement. Also, in all educational courses, especially in the virtual education process, interaction can increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the educational process and, as a result, engage students. The school library plays an important role in creating a bridge between students and teachers and content, as well as engaging students. A school library can create a communication bridge through information literacy education. Student relationships with the library are enriched through multimedia assignments that enhance student learning. Technology creates more opportunities to deepen student engagement with the library through more and more meaningful contacts with librarians. In all the roles played by the school library, including teacher, consultant, information specialist, and leadership, the basic role of the school library is the relationship builder. Therefore, school library efforts should be focused on helping to create a supportive culture that fosters student success and learning, because active and engaging libraries play a vital role in education.
Originality/value: This research has comprehensively examined the role of school libraries in fostering student engagement within the context of virtual education. The findings of this study can serve as a valuable resource for administrators, teachers and librarians seeking to understand the significance and function of school libraries in the field of virtual learning. This research offers a novel contribution by comprehensively examining the multifaceted role of school libraries in fostering student engagement within the virtual education landscape. By employing a qualitative meta-synthesis approach and analyzing a substantial dataset of articles, the study identifies six key functions of school libraries in promoting student engagement, expanding upon previous research. Moreover, the research underscores the critical importance of school librarians as collaborative partners with teachers in creating the engaging and effective virtual learning environments. This study fills a knowledge gap by providing a deep understanding of the strategies and practices implemented to enhance student engagement through school library services, ultimately leading to improved educational outcomes. Given the high cost of information resources, inadequate infrastructure and limited school budgets, it is recommended that non-governmental organizations provide support to strengthen and develop school libraries.
Method: The approach of the current research is qualitative and its method is meta-synthesis. The research population consists of 95 articles about the role of school libraries in student engagement in the process of virtual education, which were published in reputable scientific journals between 2000 and 2023. The research sample includes 50 articles that were purposefully collected and selected based on thematic analysis. Data were collected from the qualitative analysis of the studied articles.
Findings: Data analysis identified six key roles for school libraries in enhancing student engagement: accessibility of content and tools, information consultation and reference services, teaching information and media literacy, professional development for teachers, teacher collaboration and communication, and integration of new technologies. These roles are associated with educational strategies that can foster student engagement. This study found that school librarians collaborate with classroom teachers to plan student homeworks and conduct collaborative teaching and assessment. Previous research has also highlighted the importance of cooperation between school librarians and teachers. Librarians can share their expertise in emerging technologies with teachers and, through their teaching partnerships, guide educators towards tools and platforms that can be effectively integrated into lessons. Moreover, effective professional development can empower teachers to become technology leaders. Regarding the tools, knowledge and support necessary for teachers in virtual education, educators can enhance their ability to apply skills and knowledge in emerging and advanced technologies. These technologies enable them to locate, evaluate and ethically use information. To strengthen the study, specific examples relevant to educational goals should be provided. On the one hand, the present study showed that content/technology, student and teacher are the three main elements of virtual education. On the other hand, engagement is the main goal of education in the 21st century. Educational engagement is the concept of active participation of students in the education process and an important factor in educational progress, which is associated with the emotional components of passion, motivation and energy. In other words, educational engagement is the quality of effort that students spend on purposeful educational activities that lead to improved learning achievement. Also, in all educational courses, especially in the virtual education process, interaction can increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the educational process and, as a result, engage students. The school library plays an important role in creating a bridge between students and teachers and content, as well as engaging students. A school library can create a communication bridge through information literacy education. Student relationships with the library are enriched through multimedia assignments that enhance student learning. Technology creates more opportunities to deepen student engagement with the library through more and more meaningful contacts with librarians. In all the roles played by the school library, including teacher, consultant, information specialist, and leadership, the basic role of the school library is the relationship builder. Therefore, school library efforts should be focused on helping to create a supportive culture that fosters student success and learning, because active and engaging libraries play a vital role in education.
Originality/value: This research has comprehensively examined the role of school libraries in fostering student engagement within the context of virtual education. The findings of this study can serve as a valuable resource for administrators, teachers and librarians seeking to understand the significance and function of school libraries in the field of virtual learning. This research offers a novel contribution by comprehensively examining the multifaceted role of school libraries in fostering student engagement within the virtual education landscape. By employing a qualitative meta-synthesis approach and analyzing a substantial dataset of articles, the study identifies six key functions of school libraries in promoting student engagement, expanding upon previous research. Moreover, the research underscores the critical importance of school librarians as collaborative partners with teachers in creating the engaging and effective virtual learning environments. This study fills a knowledge gap by providing a deep understanding of the strategies and practices implemented to enhance student engagement through school library services, ultimately leading to improved educational outcomes. Given the high cost of information resources, inadequate infrastructure and limited school budgets, it is recommended that non-governmental organizations provide support to strengthen and develop school libraries.
Type of Study: qualitative |
Subject:
Libraries Services
Received: 2023/08/25 | Accepted: 2023/11/11 | Published: 2024/03/29
Received: 2023/08/25 | Accepted: 2023/11/11 | Published: 2024/03/29
References
1. Abedinian, F., Ahmadipour, M., & Saidi, H. (2019). Making students interested in math education with multimedia and moviemaker software with the spread of Corona disease. The Fifth National Conference on New Events in Education and Research. (in Persian)
2. Abolmaali Alhosseini, K. (2020). Psychological and instructional consequences of Corona disease (Covid-19) and coping strategies with them. Educational Psychology, 16(55), 157-193. [DOI:10.22054/jep.2020.52371.2993 (in Persian)]
3. Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: Effective student engagement strategies. Education Sciences, 11(1), 24. [DOI:10.3390/educsci11010024]
4. Ahshan, R. (2021). A framework of implementing strategies for active student engagement in remote/online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9), 483. [DOI:10.3390/educsci11090483]
5. Amani, G., & Azarnavid, F. (2010). School libraries and their role in creating reading habits in students. Ardabil: Taraz. (in Persian)
6. Angelino, L. M., & Natvig, D. (2009). A conceptual model for engagement of the online learner. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), 1-19. [DOI:10.9743/JEO.2009.1.4]
7. Appleton, L. (2020). Academic libraries and student engagement: A literature review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 26(2-4), 189-213. [DOI:10.1080/13614533.2020.1784762]
8. Arguello, M. (2018). Student engagement: What is the best way to motivate students in the secondary classroom? Honors Projects, 713. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/honorsprojects/713
9. Backs, A. (2017). Promoting online learner self-efficacy through instructional strategies and course supports (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).
10. Baker, A. (2016). Active learning with interactive videos: Creating student-guided learning materials. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 10(3-4), 79-87. [DOI:10.1080/1533290X.2016.1206776]
11. Beck, D. (2015). The online school librarian: roles and responsibilities. TechTrends, 59, 77-84. [DOI:10.1007/s11528-015-0856-8]
12. Blummer, B. A., & Kritskaya, O. (2009). Best practices for creating an online tutorial: A literature review. Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 199-216. [DOI:10.1080/19322900903050799]
13. Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2021). Factors underlying the perceived importance of online student engagement strategies. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(2), 404-419. [DOI:10.1108/JARHE-02-2020-0045]
14. Boyer, B., & Kelly, R. (2014). K-12 online and blended learning, school libraries, and school librarians. In: R. E. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning (pp. 365 - 388). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
15. Buelow, J. R., Barry, T., & Rich, L. E. (2018). Supporting learning engagement with online students. Online Learning, 22(4), 313-340. [DOI:10.24059/olj.v22i4.1384]
16. Burns, E. (2020). School librarians online: Integrated learning beyond the school walls. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 631-644. [DOI:10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0107]
17. Campana, K., Martens, M., Filippi, A., & Clunis, J. (2022). A "library school": Building a collaborative preschool-library partnership to support whole family engagement. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(1), 71-82. [DOI:10.1007/s10643-020-01127-4]
18. Casimiro, L. T. (2016). Cognitive engagement in online intercultural interactions: Beyond analytics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 441-447. [DOI:10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.729]
19. Cassidy, A., Fu, G., Valley, W., Lomas, C., Jovel, E., & Riseman, A. (2016). Flexible learning strategies in first through fourth-year courses. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 9, 83-94. [DOI:10.22329/celt.v9i0.4438]
20. Chakraborty, M., & Muyia Nafukho, F. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: What do students want in online courses? European Journal of Training and Development, 38(9), 782-802. [DOI:10.1108/EJTD-11-2013-0123]
21. Connolly, B., & Golderman, G. M. (2008). Listen up: Discovering the reference and instructional applications of Apple's tunes. Urban Library Journal, 15(1), Article 4. Retrieved from: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/ulj/vol15/iss1/4 [DOI:10.31641/ulj150104]
22. Cuthbertson, W., & Falcone, A. (2014). Elevating engagement and community in online courses. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3-4), 216-224. [DOI:10.1080/1533290X.2014.945839]
23. Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. TechTrends, 60, 532-539. [DOI:10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z]
24. De Gagne, J. C., & Walters, K. (2009). Online teaching experience: A qualitative metasynthesis (QMS). MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 577-589. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no4/degagne_1209.pdf
25. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-13. Retrieved from: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1744
26. Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 25. [DOI:10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x]
27. Glynn, L. (2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 387-399. [DOI:10.1108/07378830610692154]
28. Hajizadeh, A., Azizi, G., & Keyhan, G. (2021). Analyzing the opportunities and challenges of e-learning in the Corona perid: An approach to the development of e-learning in the post-Corona. Research in Teaching, 9(1), 204-174. https://trj.uok.ac.ir/article_61979.html. (in Persian)
29. Hassanzadeh, M. (September 30, 2018). The beginning of the school year. Ministry of Education and School Libraries: Part of the fundamental transformation document that has been neglected. Retrieved from: http://ipla.ir/?p=1709. (in Persian)
30. Hay, L., & Todd, R. J. (2010). Research columns one, 2010: School libraries 21C-the conversation begins. Scan, 29(1), 30-42. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.913978838127883
31. Heo, H., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2021). Enhancing learning engagement during COVID‐19 pandemic: Self‐efficacy in time management, technology use, and online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1640-1652. [DOI:10.1111/jcal.12603]
32. Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320-341. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.12235]
33. Hibbard, L., & Franklin, T. (2015). Libraries in online elementary schools: A mixed-methods study. TechTrends, 59, 85-91. [DOI:10.1080/04250494.2018.1558030]
34. Kammer, J., King, M., Donahay, A., & Koeberl, H. (2021). Strategies for successful school librarian and teacher collaboration. School Library Research, 24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1292862.pdf
35. Keykha, A., & Mohammadimehr, M. (2020). Systematic review of learning changes as technology grows. Nama: Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 60-74. https://nama.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-340-fa.html (in Persian)
36. Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., & Kouraichi, B. (2021). Emergency remote learning during COVID-19 crisis: Students' engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7033-7055. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/S10639-021-10566-4 [DOI:10.1007/s10639-021-10566-4]
37. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching Online: A Practical Guide (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203855201]
38. Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003). The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. College & Research Libraries, 64(4), 256-282. [DOI:10.5860/crl.64.4.256]
39. Kurt, G., Atay, D., & Öztürk, H. A. (2022). Student engagement in K12 online education during the pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(Sup1), S31-S47. [DOI:10.1080/15391523.2021.1920518]
40. Mahmood, S. (2021). Instructional strategies for online teaching in COVID‐19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 199-203. [DOI:10.1002/hbe2.218]
41. Majidi, A. (2012). The role of digital libraries to support of e-learning. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 27(2), 369-384. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699131.html. (in Persian)
42. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. [DOI:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092]
43. Matizirofa, L., Soyizwapi, L., Siwela, A., & Khosie, M. (2021). Maintaining student engagement: The digital shift during the coronavirus pandemic: A case of the library at the University of Pretoria. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 27(3), 364-379. [DOI:10.1080/13614533.2021.1976234]
44. Merga, M. K. (2020). School librarians as literacy educators within a complex role. Journal of Library Administration, 60(8), 889-908. [DOI:10.1080/01930826.2020.1820278]
45. Muir, T., Douglas, T., & Trimble, A. (2020). Facilitation strategies for enhancing the learning and engagement of online students. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(3), 8. [DOI:10.53761/1.17.3.8]
46. Neshat, N., & Horri, A. (2007). School libraries in a library-oriented school. Tehran: Chapar; Bookseller Network. (in Persian)
47. Nguyen, T., Netto, C. L., Wilkins, J. F., Bröker, P., Vargas, E. E., Sealfon, C. D., ... & Stein, G. M. (2021). Insights into students' experiences and perceptions of remote learning methods: From the COVID-19 pandemic to best practice for the future. In: Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 647986) [DOI:10.3389/feduc.2021.647986]
48. Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345-387. [DOI:10.1177/0162353213480864]
49. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002]
50. Ross, A., & Furno, C. (2011). Active learning in the library instruction environment: An exploratory study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(4), 953-970. [DOI:10.1353/pla.2011.0039]
51. Ryle, A., & Cumming, K. (2007). Reflections on engagement in online learning communities. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 3(3), 35-46. [DOI:10.5172/ijpl.3.3.35]
52. Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593-619. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.13190]
53. Santos Green, L., Jones, S. A., & Burke, P. A. (2017). School librarians fully online: preparing the twenty-first century professional. School Library Research, 20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150570.pdf
54. Schultz-Jones, B., & Oberg, D. (Eds.). (2022). Global Action for School Libraries: Models of Inquiry (Vol. 182). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. [DOI:10.1515/9783110772586]
55. Shannon, D. M. (2009). Principals' perceptions of school librarians. School Libraries Worldwide, 15(2), 1. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/libsci_facpub/28/
56. Shepherd, S. S., Skinner, D., & Fernekes, R. W. (2007). Library tools for connecting with the curriculum: How to create a professional development workshop for teaching faculty. Georgia Library Quarterly, 44(1), 5. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/glq/vol44/iss1/5/ [DOI:10.62915/2157-0396.1037]
57. Shoham, S., & Shemer-Shalman, Z. (2008). Web sites and digital services in Israeli school libraries: How is a digital environment changing how school libraries work? School Libraries Worldwide, 14(1), 86-98. [DOI:10.29173/slw6770]
58. Small, R. V., Shanahan, K. A., & Stasak, M. (2010). The impact of New York's school libraries on student achievement and motivation: Phase III. School Library Media Research, 13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ888376.pdf
59. Subramainan, L., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2020). A systematic review on students' engagement in classroom: Indicators, challenges and computational techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(1), 105-115. [DOI:10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110113]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
