XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farhoodi F. Religion and relevance judgment: The effect of users’ religiosity scales on their relevance judgment. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2023; 29 (4) :518-531
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2493-en.html
Faculty of Social Science, Communications and Media, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran , faezehfarhoodi2000@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (463 Views)
Purpose: The main purpose of this research is investigation of effect of the users’ religiosity on their relevance judgment. 
Method: This research is practical in terms of purpose and was conducted using the descriptive survey design. The statistical population of the research consisted of all fourth-level doctoral students at Al-Zahra University, whose number was 69. Mean and Standard deviation were used to describe the statistical data, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient and simultaneous regression analysis were used to analyze the data. In order to collect information about the level of users’ adherence to religiosity dimensions, Glock and Stark’s religiosity questionnaire (1968) was used which includes 26 items arranged in 4 dimensions of beliefs, emotional, consequential, and ritual. Then, in order to determine the degree of relevance judgment, 6 simulated work tasks were defined and the most important criteria of relevance judgment were evaluated during the execution of work tasks. First, the users searched on the topic of work tasks in Persian paper databases, including Magiran, SID and Ensani Portal (Iran’s Humanities Portal), and they selected 10 papers for each task. After reading each scenario and the demand related to it, users evaluated the papers related to each scenario in a related, somewhat related, unrelated format. Therefore, each user evaluated 30 papers related to 6 work tasks.
Findings: The findings indicates that among the religiosity dimensions, the interactive behavior of users showed a higher average than the interactive performance and relevance judgment. Moreover, the average of practices dimension was the highest, followed by belief dimension, and emotion dimension. Finally, the works dimension showed the lowest average. The results of multiple regression test showed that users’ ritual and behavioral dimension (such as worship, prayer, participation in special religious rites, fasting, etc.) and belief dimension and religious beliefs are effective in increasing relevance judgment, but the two affective and emotional dimensions have nothing to do with the judgment of users. In other words, despite the change in the emotional dimension of the users, i.e., the change in the degree of emotions, imaginations and feelings related to having a relationship with a divine entity such as God or an ultimate reality or a supreme authority, their relevance judgment would not change. Furthermore, despite the change in the ‘consequences dimension’ of religiosity, i.e., the change in the effects of religious beliefs, actions, experiences and knowledge on the daily life of users, the level of their relevance judgment did not show a change.
Originality/value: The present research is the first research that has explored the effect of users’ religiosity scales on relevance judgment. According to the findings, it is suggested that system designers and experts, in addition to considering technical issues and hardware and software equipment, should also manage the interactions of users with the system and consider the different conditions and situations of users. Librarians, while knowing the society in which the users are located and considering the religious context of the society as well as knowing the religious approaches of the users, can provide the necessary guidance to them when retrieving information.
Full-Text [PDF 707 kb]   (275 Downloads)    
Type of Study: quantitative | Subject: Information Retrieval
Received: 2023/04/6 | Accepted: 2023/09/17 | Published: 2023/12/22

References
1. Abdi, M., & Rezaee, A. (2014). A study on the piety levels among university students. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 13(24), 95-112. (in Persian)
2. Asadnia, A., CheshmehSohrabi, M., Shaban, A., & Taheri Demneh, M. (2021). Identifying key factors affecting on future of text information retrieval: A cross-impact analysis method. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 36(3), 861-892. [DOI:10.52547/jipm.36.3.861 (in Persian)]
3. Babaei, M., & Hoseini, M. (2015). The relationship between adherence to religious values and the feeling of social security among the students of Payam Noor University in Divandarreh. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 12(2), 1-22. (in Persian)
4. Bahmani, R. (2020). Investigating the relationship between religiosity, professional commitment and job satisfaction with audit quality considering the ineffective role of the auditor [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Shiraz University. (in Persian)
5. Bahreini, N., Mirzabeigi, M., & Sotoudeh, H. (2018). The browsing performance differences among users with different cognitive styles and experiences: Case study of shopping websites. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 29(1), 67-84. (in Persian)
6. Borlund, P. (2000). Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of documentation, 56(1), 71-90. [DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000007110]
7. Farhoudi, F. (2009). Effect of mental state on the rate of identifying the relevancy of documents retrieved in a search. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 24(4), 53-67. (in Persian)
8. Farhoodi, F. (2019). The effect of cultural attitudes of master students in knowledge and information science on relevance judgment: according to Hofstede’s cultural attitude indicators. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 34(3), 1399-1422. (in Persian)
9. Farhoodi, F., & Hariri, N. (2013). The effect of users’ personality characteristics on relevance judgment. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 29(2), 317-331. (in Persian)
10. Ghanavati, A. (2022). The effect of religiosity, perceived risk on tax compliance intention with regard to the mediating role of taxpayers’ attitude [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Zand Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz (in Persian)
11. Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.
12. Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain‐analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:63.0.CO;2-Y]
13. Hukkinen, J. P. (2011). Less is more–The paradox of choice in search-engine use [Unpublished master’s thesis]. The University of Helsinki, Finland.
14. Kelly, D. (2009). Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(1-2), 1-224. [DOI:10.1561/1500000012]
15. Khodadadi-Sangdeh, J. (2017). Qualitative study of religious factors involved in the formation of a healthy family on the basis of social-cultural context. Cultural Psychology, 1(1), 85-98. (in Persian)
16. Kiani, M. (2012). Information retrieval systems evaluation approaches: Background and future prospects. Library and Information Sciences, 15(2), 243-258. (in Persian)
17. Kinley, K., Tjondronegoro, D., Partridge, H., & Edwards, S. (2012, November). Human-computer interaction: the impact of users’ cognitive styles on query reformulation behaviour during web searching. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 299-307). [DOI:10.1145/2414536.2414586]
18. Li, Y., & Belkin, N. J. (2010). An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1771-1789. [DOI:10.1002/asi.21359]
19. Makkizadeh, F., & Bigdel, Z. (2014). Social cognitive theory: An effective approach in information behavior. Library and Information Science Research, 4(2), 131-147. (in Persian)
20. Mansouri, A. (2010). Semantic theory of information. Library and Information Science, 13(3), 101-129. (in Persian)
21. Mirzabeigi, M., Sanatjoo, A., & Dayani, M. H. (2013). Investigating the relevance judgment process in the selection and evaluation of information sources based on approach of Riding’s analytical holistic cognitive theory. Library and Information Science, 15(4), 93-117 (in Persian)
22. Nabati, A., & khadivi, G. (2019). Investigating the relationship between the use of new communication media and the religiosity of youth aged 18-29 in Mashhad. Pure Life, 5(16), 165-193. (in Persian)
23. Nemati Lafmejani, S., Alipour-Hafezi, M., Babalhavaeji, F., Hariri, N., & Fahimnia, F. (2021). Developing a Framework for Interactive Information Retrieval of Digital Libraries Based on Bandura's Social-Cognitive Theory. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 37(1), 135-169. [DOI:10.52547/jipm.37.1.135 (in Persian)]
24. Peng, S. (2013, June). Maximizing and satisficing in decision-making dyads. Wharton Research Scholars. http://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars/98
25. Pirmaleki, P. (2018). Religion and management: A systematic study and presentation of a conceptual model [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kharazmi university. (in Persian)
26. Shahidi, A. (2018). Investigating the relationship between practicing religious beliefs and the feeling of social security among students of Arak universities in the academic year 2014-2015. Theological-Doctrinal Research, 8(31), 103-118. (in Persian)
27. Shakib, Z., & Jamali, S. (2019). The use of religious teachings in preventing risky behaviors and enjoying a healthy lifestyle in teenagers. Journal of New Achievements in Humanities Studies, 2(18), 27-36. (in Persian)
28. Tajik Esmaeili, S. (2021). Predicting students’ religiosity based on their dependence on the Internet and belief in a just world. Religion & Communication, 27(2), 29-79. (in Persian)
29. Tian, X., Du, X., Hu, H., & Li, H. (2009). Modeling individual cognitive structure in contextual information retrieval. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 57(6), 1048-1056. [DOI:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.059]
30. Yari, S., & Noruzi, A. (2021). Emotions and Emotion Theories in Information Retrieval: Roles and Applications. Library and Information Science Research, 10(2), 297-320. (in Persian)
31. Zarif Ghasemian, N., Fattahi, R., & Nowkarizi, M. (2020). Studying users’ relevance judgment for images retrieved from Google search engine. Library and Information Sciences, 23(1), 104-120. (in Persian)
32. Zhuang, M., Toms, E. G., & Demartini, G. (2016). The relationship between user perception and user behaviour in interactive information retrieval evaluation. In Advances in Information Retrieval: 38th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2016, Padua, Italy, March 20–23, 2016. Proceedings 38 (pp. 293-305). Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_22]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research on Information Science and Public Libraries

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb