Volume 29, Issue 2 (9-2023)
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2023, 29(2): 220-237 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Yari S, Alireza N, Fahimnia F, Nowkarizi M. An Analysis of the Book Selection Behavior of Adolescent Members of Public Libraries in Iran. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2023; 29 (2) :220-237
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2431-en.html
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2431-en.html
Knowledge and Information Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , yari.shiva@gmail.com
Abstract: (1040 Views)
Purpose: The correct selection of information sources significantly impacts the readability of the retrieved sources in the library. On the other hand, the collection development, organization of resources, and their classification in libraries, as well as the design of efficient and user-friendly user interfaces that sufficiently support the selection of resources, require sufficient knowledge of the behavior of choosing resources by users. Based on this, the present study aimed to identify the components of book selection behavior by adolescent members of public libraries in Kermanshah Province of Iran.
Method: The current research was conducted with a qualitative approach, and the research method was the qualitative content analysis. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews. The participants were adolescent members of Kermanshah Province public libraries affiliated to the Iran Public Libraries Foundation in the winter of 2021. The purposive sampling, also known as judgmental sampling, was used to select participants, and continued until data saturation was reached. The qualitative content analysis method was used to analyze the findings.
Findings: The analysis of the interview data led to the formation of 12 main codes and 285 sub-codes, which were classified into 5 categories and 30 concepts. The main categories were: factors related to the user (including demographic characteristics; personality and intellectual characteristics; interest; life issues and events; previous knowledge; experiences and skills; the goals of selecting a book in public libraries; time and cost spent to select; selection strategies; the process of selecting a book; measurement of credit and quality of resources; the causes of communicating with the book and reading it up to the end; reasons for not reading or half reading books); factors related to books (including apparent and physical elements; bibliographic elements; content elements; mold, language, expression and style); factors related to the library (consisting of reading programs; environmental factors; facilities and facilities; human factors); people, media, productions, occasions, programs, and lists influencing book selection (including persons; media; production of printed works; occasions and programs; lists); and barriers to book selection in public libraries (includes: library; book; person; society).
Originality/Value: The behavior of selecting information resources of adolescent members of public libraries showed the complexity and influence of this behavior by numerous factors, including individual differences, appearance and content characteristics of books, environmental factors, and library factors. The components identified in the aforementioned behavior can be used as a basis for a broad survey of users’ information resource selection behavior in physical and virtual environments and can also be used as a guide for acquisition, space creation and service design in libraries, compilation of resources and appearance, and structural design of books by authors and publishers.
Method: The current research was conducted with a qualitative approach, and the research method was the qualitative content analysis. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews. The participants were adolescent members of Kermanshah Province public libraries affiliated to the Iran Public Libraries Foundation in the winter of 2021. The purposive sampling, also known as judgmental sampling, was used to select participants, and continued until data saturation was reached. The qualitative content analysis method was used to analyze the findings.
Findings: The analysis of the interview data led to the formation of 12 main codes and 285 sub-codes, which were classified into 5 categories and 30 concepts. The main categories were: factors related to the user (including demographic characteristics; personality and intellectual characteristics; interest; life issues and events; previous knowledge; experiences and skills; the goals of selecting a book in public libraries; time and cost spent to select; selection strategies; the process of selecting a book; measurement of credit and quality of resources; the causes of communicating with the book and reading it up to the end; reasons for not reading or half reading books); factors related to books (including apparent and physical elements; bibliographic elements; content elements; mold, language, expression and style); factors related to the library (consisting of reading programs; environmental factors; facilities and facilities; human factors); people, media, productions, occasions, programs, and lists influencing book selection (including persons; media; production of printed works; occasions and programs; lists); and barriers to book selection in public libraries (includes: library; book; person; society).
Originality/Value: The behavior of selecting information resources of adolescent members of public libraries showed the complexity and influence of this behavior by numerous factors, including individual differences, appearance and content characteristics of books, environmental factors, and library factors. The components identified in the aforementioned behavior can be used as a basis for a broad survey of users’ information resource selection behavior in physical and virtual environments and can also be used as a guide for acquisition, space creation and service design in libraries, compilation of resources and appearance, and structural design of books by authors and publishers.
Type of Study: qualitative |
Subject:
Child and Adolescent Studies
Received: 2022/10/1 | Accepted: 2024/02/29 | Published: 2023/09/1
Received: 2022/10/1 | Accepted: 2024/02/29 | Published: 2023/09/1
References
1. استراوس، آنسلم؛ و کوربین، جولیت (1384). اصول روش پژوهش کیفی: نظریۀ مبنایی؛ رویهها و روشها (بیوک محمدی، مترجم). تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
2. حریری، نجلا (1385). اصول و روشهای پژوهش کیفی. تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات.
3. خواجه، طیبه؛ و بلاغی، رویا (1397، 25 تیر). بررسی رفتار اطلاعیابی سلامت کاربران کتابخانههای عمومی شهر بندرعباس [ارائۀ مقاله]. اولین همایش فناوری اطلاعات و ارتقای سلامت، انجمن فناوری اطلاعات و ارتقای سلامت، تهران، ایران
4. شکوهیان، محبوبه؛ عاصمی، عاصفه؛ و شعبانی، احمد. (1397). بررسی نیازهای اطلاعاتی نوجوانان کتابخانههای عمومی شهر اصفهان. مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات، 10(3)، 65-86.
5. نعمتالهی، لیلا (1391). بررسی نگرش کتابداران کتابخانههای عمومی استان فارس نسبت به روش مجموعهسازی متمرکز در این کتابخانهها [پایاننامۀ کارشناسیارشد]. دانشگاه شیراز.
Abel, E., Keane, J., Paton, N. W., Fernandes, A. A. A., Koehler, M., Konstantinou, N., Rios, J. C. C., Azuan, N. A., & Embury, S. M. (2018). User driven multi-criteria source selection. Information Sciences, 430-431, 179-199. [DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.019]
6. Callan, J. P., Lu, Z., & Croft, W. B. (1995, July). Searching distributed collections with inference networks. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 21-28). [DOI:10.1145/215206.215328]
7. Carroll, V. (2015). Preschool Story time in Auckland's public libraries: A qualitative study of book selection practices [Master's thesis, Victoria University of Wellington]. VUW Research Archive. http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/4690
8. Dawkins, B. K. (2017). Need Help Choosing Good Books for Students? A Book Selection Study, Book Selection Checklist, and a Discussion of How Educators Can Select Books that Engage Young Readers of Color and Possibly Improve Reading Achievement. Journal of Education &Social Policy, 4(2), 1-10. [DOI:10.5430/irhe.v2n4p38]
9. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-88. [DOI:10.1177/1049732305276687] [PMID]
10. Mikkonen, A., & Vakkari, P. (2016). Readers' interest criteria in fiction book search in library catalogs. Journal of Documentation, 72(4), 696-715. [DOI:10.1108/JDOC-11-2015-0142]
11. Mohr, K. A. (2006). Children'sf choices for recreational reading: A three-part investigation of selection preferences, rationales, and processes. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 81-104. [DOI:10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_4]
12. Randall, R. (2013). How young adult readers select fiction in public libraries: A study of the factors which influence information-seeking in context [Masterʼs thesis, Victoria University of Wellington]. VUW Research Archive. https://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/2659
13. Reuter, K. (2007). Assessing aesthetic relevance: children's book selection in a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(12), 1745-1763. [DOI:10.1002/asi.20657]
14. Ross, C. S. (2000). Making choices: What readers say about choosing books to read for pleasure. The Acquisitions Librarian, 13(25), 5-21. [DOI:10.1300/J101v13n25_02]
15. Tao, D. (2008). Using theory of reasoned action (TRA) in understanding selection and use of information resources: An information resource selection and use model [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia]. MOspace Institutional Repository. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/6736
16. Taylor, J. B., Hora, A., & Krueger, K. S. (2019). Self-selecting books in a children's fiction collection arranged by genre. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 852-865. [DOI:10.1177/0961000617743088]
17. Wilkinson, K., Andries, V., Howarth, D., Bonsall, J., Sabeti, S., & McGeown, S. (2020). Reading During adolescence: Why adolescents choose (or do not choose) books. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(2), 157-166. [DOI:10.1002/jaal.1065]
18. Xie, I., & Joo, S. (2009). Selection of information sources: Accessibility of and familiarity with sources, and types of tasks. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-18. [DOI:10.1002/meet.2009.1450460215]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
