A comparative study of national reading policies of iran and selected countries

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in KIS, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Department of Education, Information and Communication, Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil;

10.61882/publlij.2025.2065898.1012
Abstract
Purpose: The main objective of this study is a comparative analysis of national reading policy documents in six selected countries (Iran, Finland, France, South Korea, Brazil, and Singapore). By focusing on the identification of key components, structural distinctions, and the extraction of global experiences in promoting a culture of reading, this research seeks to provide a foundation for cultural policymakers to benefit from international practices.
Methods: This study adopts a qualitative approach and applies a comparative–analytical method. The selection of documents was carried out purposively, based on criteria such as geographical diversity, timeliness (between 2010 and 2024), and content comprehensiveness. Data were collected through thematic analysis of official policy documents, and the analysis was conducted using a systematic checklist covering elements such as overarching goals, target groups, responsible institutions, strategies, supporting technologies, and evaluation indicators.
Results: The findings reveal that countries such as Finland, Singapore, and South Korea, by adopting data-driven approaches, systematically utilizing technology, addressing multilingualism, and strengthening institutional participation, have succeeded in formulating and implementing coherent, targeted, and effective policies for promoting a reading culture. In contrast, policy documents from Iran and Brazil focus more on reinforcing cultural and identity values, while exhibiting less institutional coherence and limited technological orientation. Among the key structural differences across countries are variations in institutional frameworks, the breadth of target groups, and the extent of technology adoption.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the success of reading policies worldwide depends on institutional coherence, attention to educational equity, the use of modern technologies, and the comprehensive participation of cultural and educational institutions. Accordingly, revising Iran’s policy documents—drawing inspiration from the experiences of countries such as Finland, Singapore, and South Korea—can improve the culture of reading and the effectiveness of cultural interventions in the country.

Keywords


Ashtarian, K., et al. (2017). Policy Implementation Studies: Challenges of Public Policy Implementation in Iran. Tehran: Policy-Maker Publications, Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. [In Persian] https://www.magiran.com/p1548075
Bray, M., Crossley, M., & Watson, K. (2003). Comparative and international research in education: Globalisation, context and difference. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452745
Conseil scientifique de l'Éducation nationale. (2019). Méthodes d’enseignement et manuels pour l’apprentissage de la lecture: Comment choisir? Académie de Paris. https://www.reseau-canope.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/Projets/conseil_scientifique_education_nationale/Manuels_VDEF_EN.pdf
da Silva, A. M. M., & dos Santos, C. P. (2023). A formação do leitor em um cenário social, político e cultural. Anais dos Seminários de Iniciação Científica, (27). https://doi.org/10.13102/semic.vi27.10854
Dale, R. (2005). Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative education41(2), 117-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500150906
Daneshvar, H., Rastegari, N., & Mehni, O. (2023). Illustrating the Effectiveness of Reading Plan with Family and Book Reading Circles on the Two Components of Reading Motivation and Literacy Rate of Students and Providin Solutions to Improve the Quality of This Plan.Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 29(2), 260-276. [In Persian] http://doi.org/10.61186/publij.29.2.260
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2021). National literacy strategy 2030. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/National_literacy_strategy_2030.pdf
Ghaderi Doust, (2016). A comparative study on objectives and components of reading skill in national curriculum of Iran and America (New Jersey) at high school. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 4(3), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.631
Karimi, R., & Asadzadeh-Baghi, M. (2024). A Meta-Analysis of Studies on Quality Assessment of Public Libraries Using the LibQUAL Model. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 30(1), 48-65. [In Persian] http://doi.org/10.61186/publij.30.1.48
Koohi Rostami, M., Nildarar, S., & Najafpour Moghadam, P. (2023). Sociological factors affecting the reading habits of undergraduate students at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Academic Library and Information Research, 57(1), 65–78. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2023.356691.1678
Lingard, B. (2014). Politics, policies and pedagogies in education. The selected work of Bob Lingard. Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203765708
Moreira, M. T. (2009). Políticas públicas do livro e leitura no Brasil (1937–1967): Um olhar institucional. Revista MATRIZes, 3(1), 129–155. https://www.revistas.usp.br/matrizes/article/download/38232/41009/45020.
Montoya, S., Opertti, R., & Siakalli, I. (2018). Monitoring progress towards SDG 4.1: comparative analysis of curriculum and assessment national frameworks for reading. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/8218977/monitoring-progress-towards-sdg-41/9133074/
National Cultural Monitoring Center. (2020). Cultural Behavior of the Iranian People. Tehran: Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. [In Persian] http://ircud.ir/oesxhs
National Library Board Singapore. (2021). National reading habits study on adults: Full report. https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/about-nlb/press-room/publications/reading-habits-study-2021
National Library for Children and Young Adults. (2011). National strategy for library development and reading promotion for children and young adults. https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2011/114-lee-en.pdf
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867396
Schüller-Zwierlein, A., Mangen, A., Kovač, M., & Van Der Weel, A. (2022). Why higher-level reading is important. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i5.12770
Statistical Center of Iran. (2021). Results of the Survey on Household Cultural Activities in 2020. Tehran: Plan and Budget Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian] https://ircud.ir/Media/PDF/1400/05/20/637642973399217630.pdf
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. (2010). Document of the Movement for the Promotion of Beneficial Reading. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. [In Persian] https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/794518
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. (2023). National Document on Reading and the Promotion of Beneficial Reading. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. [In Persian] https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/1808218
Vasfi, M., & Chehraghani, M. (2013). A Critical Review of the “Document of the Movement for the Promotion of Beneficial Reading”. Ketab-e Mah-e Kolliyat (General Book Monthly), 16(6), 70–72. [In Persian] https://www.magiran.com/p1128146