Volume 30, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2024, 30(1): 28-46 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Eisazadeh P, Shaghaghi M. A Study on the Social Responsibilities of Iranian Public Libraries. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2024; 30 (1) :28-46
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2498-en.html
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2498-en.html
Department of KIS, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding author) , m_shaghaghi@sbu.ac.ir
Abstract: (3342 Views)
Purpose: This study aims to identify, categorize and analyze the components of social responsibility in Iranian public libraries. Specifically, it seeks to determine the extent to which these components are realized within Iranian public libraries.
Methodology: This research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative methods. In the qualitative phase, through a review of English-language research articles, the components of social responsibility in public libraries were identified and categorized into 5 primary dimensions and 11 sub-categories. A conceptual model was designed using a concept sorting method. In the quantitative phase, a questionnaire was developed based on the identified components. Content validity was established using the Content Validity Index (CVI), with a mean CVI of .80 per item. Reliability was assessed through the split-half method, yielding a Spearman-Brown coefficient of .891. Data collection occurred between January 2023 - June 2023. The sample size was calculated to be approximately 160 participants using Cochran's formula. Then, a systematic sampling technique was employed to select 80 participants from Hosseiniyeh Ershad Library and another 80 from Park-e Shahr Library, both located in Tehran. Data collection spanned a period of 45 days. For data analysis, a variety of statistical tests were utilized, including binomial tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and structural equation modeling.
Findings: The study revealed a complex structure of social responsibility in public libraries, composed of five primary dimensions and eleven secondary dimensions. These dimensions include popularization of critical rationality, encompassing critical thinking and historical awareness; responsiveness, characterized by reasoned argumentation and a commitment to justice; dialogical rationality, emphasizing freedom of expression and inclusive dialogue; social inspiration, fostering social art and literature; and socialization, promoting privacy, community integration, and public awareness. The findings indicated a general gap between the expected and actual levels of social responsibility in the studied libraries. While no significant differences were observed between the responses of users from the two libraries, demographic factors such as age and income influenced perceptions of social responsibility. Younger individuals (aged 31-40) were less likely to perceive social inspiration as fulfilled, while those with higher incomes (10-15 million Tomans per month) reported lower levels of satisfaction in critical rationality, social inspiration and socialization. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that the paths of critical rationality, social inspiration, and socialization were the only significant paths in the model, meaning that dialogical rationality is a factor influencing social inspiration, and the combined effect of these two factors influences socialization. Furthermore, dialogical rationality had the most powerful indirect effect on socialization, suggesting that popularization of dialogical rationality is the most prioritized social responsibility of public libraries.
Originality/Value: This research contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the components of social responsibility in public libraries. Additionally, it highlights the significance of dialogic rationality in achieving the broader goals of social responsibility within these institutions.
Methodology: This research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative methods. In the qualitative phase, through a review of English-language research articles, the components of social responsibility in public libraries were identified and categorized into 5 primary dimensions and 11 sub-categories. A conceptual model was designed using a concept sorting method. In the quantitative phase, a questionnaire was developed based on the identified components. Content validity was established using the Content Validity Index (CVI), with a mean CVI of .80 per item. Reliability was assessed through the split-half method, yielding a Spearman-Brown coefficient of .891. Data collection occurred between January 2023 - June 2023. The sample size was calculated to be approximately 160 participants using Cochran's formula. Then, a systematic sampling technique was employed to select 80 participants from Hosseiniyeh Ershad Library and another 80 from Park-e Shahr Library, both located in Tehran. Data collection spanned a period of 45 days. For data analysis, a variety of statistical tests were utilized, including binomial tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and structural equation modeling.
Findings: The study revealed a complex structure of social responsibility in public libraries, composed of five primary dimensions and eleven secondary dimensions. These dimensions include popularization of critical rationality, encompassing critical thinking and historical awareness; responsiveness, characterized by reasoned argumentation and a commitment to justice; dialogical rationality, emphasizing freedom of expression and inclusive dialogue; social inspiration, fostering social art and literature; and socialization, promoting privacy, community integration, and public awareness. The findings indicated a general gap between the expected and actual levels of social responsibility in the studied libraries. While no significant differences were observed between the responses of users from the two libraries, demographic factors such as age and income influenced perceptions of social responsibility. Younger individuals (aged 31-40) were less likely to perceive social inspiration as fulfilled, while those with higher incomes (10-15 million Tomans per month) reported lower levels of satisfaction in critical rationality, social inspiration and socialization. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that the paths of critical rationality, social inspiration, and socialization were the only significant paths in the model, meaning that dialogical rationality is a factor influencing social inspiration, and the combined effect of these two factors influences socialization. Furthermore, dialogical rationality had the most powerful indirect effect on socialization, suggesting that popularization of dialogical rationality is the most prioritized social responsibility of public libraries.
Originality/Value: This research contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive framework for understanding the components of social responsibility in public libraries. Additionally, it highlights the significance of dialogic rationality in achieving the broader goals of social responsibility within these institutions.
Keywords: Social responsibility, Public library, Dialogic rationality, Critical rationality, Accountability rationality, Social inspiration, Community building
Type of Study: qualitative |
Subject:
Social Studies
Received: 2023/08/10 | Accepted: 2023/11/18 | Published: 2024/03/29
Received: 2023/08/10 | Accepted: 2023/11/18 | Published: 2024/03/29
References
1. Audunson R. (2005). The public library as a meeting place in a multicultural and digital context: The necessity of low-intensive meeting-places. Journal of Documentation, 61(3): 429-441. [DOI:10.1108/00220410510598562]
2. Audunson R. and Evjen, S. (2017). The public library: an arena for an enlightened and rational public sphere? The case of Norway. Information Research, 22(1), Retrieved August 6, 2023, from: http://InformationR.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1641.html.
3. Audunson R. et al. (2019). Public libraries as public sphere institutions: A comparative study of perceptions of the public library's role in six European countries. Journal of Documentation, 75(6): 1396-1415. [DOI:10.1108/JD-02-2019-0015]
4. Bahmani A. and Seyedin S. M. (2018) Social intelligence of librarians and its role in the increase of the social responsibility of libraries: A case study of public libraries of Markazi province. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 24 (4): 591-612. (in Persian)
5. Buschman J. E. (2010). The social as fundamental and a source of the critical: Jürgen Habermas. In: Gloria J. Leckie, Lisa M. Given, and John E. Buschman (Eds.), Critical Theory in Library and Information Science, Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 161-172. [DOI:10.5040/9798400634420.ch-013]
6. Buschman J. E. (2020). Education, the public sphere and neoliberalism: Libraries' contexts. The Library Quarterly, 90(2): 154-161. [DOI:10.1086/707671]
7. Carlsson H., Hanell F. and Engström, L. (2023). Revisiting the notion of the public library as a meeting place: Challenges to the mission of promoting democracy in times of political turmoil. Journal of Documentation, 79(70): 178-195. [DOI:10.1108/JD-03-2023-0061]
8. Christensen H. D. (2010). Roland Barthes: On semiology and taxonomy. In: Gloria J. Leckie, Lisa M. Given and John E. Buschman (Eds.), Critical Theory in Library and Information Science, Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 15-28. [DOI:10.5040/9798400634420.ch-002]
9. Fadaie G. (2012). New functions for libraries and information centers. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 18 (1): 7-24. (in Persian)
10. Grigor T. (2004). Recultivating "good taste": The early Pahlavi Modernists and their society for national heritage. Iranian Studies, 37(1): 17-45. [DOI:10.1080/0021086042000232929]
11. Helling J. (2012). Public Libraries and Their National Policies. International Case Studies. First edition. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. [DOI:10.1533/9781780633107]
12. Jochumsen H., Hvenegaard Rasmussen C. and Skot-Hansen D. (2012). The four spaces - a new model for the public library. New Library World, 113(11/12): 586-597. [DOI:10.1108/03074801211282948]
13. Johnston J. et al. (2021). Public librarians' perception of their professional role and the library's role in supporting the public sphere: A multi-country comparison. Journal of Documentation, 78 (5): 1109-1130. [DOI:10.1108/JD-09-2021-0178]
14. Kohlberg L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In: Review of Child Development Research, ed. M.L. Hoffman and L.W. Hoffman, Vol. I, S. 381-431. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
15. Koizumi K. and Widdersheim M. M. (2016). Surpassing the business model: A public sphere approach to public library management. Library Review, 65(6/7): 404-419. [DOI:10.1108/LR-11-2015-0111]
16. Larsen H. (2020). Theorizing public libraries as public spheres in library and information science. In: Sustainable Digital Communities: 15th International Conference, iConference 2020, Boras, Sweden, March 23-26, 2020, Proceedings 15 (pp. 564-570). Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-43687-2_46]
17. Larsen H. (2020). The public sphere and Habermas: reflections on the current state of theory in public library research. Journal of Documentation, 77 (1): 251-258. [DOI:10.1108/JD-05-2020-0075]
18. Newman J. (2007). Re-mapping the public: public libraries and the public sphere. Cultural studies, 21(6): 887-909. [DOI:10.1080/09502380701470916]
19. Parsazadeh A. and Shaghaghi M. (2010). Public libraries and social construction of reality. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 15 (4): 29-60. (in Persian)
20. Pourhadi I. V. (1968). Iran's public and private libraries. The Quarterly Journal of the Library of Congress, 25(3): 218-229.
21. Raber D. (2007). ACONDA and ANACONDA: Social change, social responsibility and librarianship. Library Trends, 55(3): 675-697. [DOI:10.1353/lib.2007.0020]
22. Racelis A. (2018). Library services for the poor: Theoretical framework for library social responsibility. Pedagogical Research, 3 (2), 06. [DOI:10.20897/pr/90831]
23. Samek T. (2022). Contemporary critical library and information studies: Ethos and ethics. In: Abdi, A.A., Misiaszek, G.W. (eds). The Palgrave Handbook on Critical Theories of Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-86343-2_19]
24. Scott R. (2011). The role of public libraries in community building. Public Library Quarterly, 30(3): 191-227. [DOI:10.1080/01616846.2011.599283]
25. Shaghaghi M. and Vasfi, M. R. (2015). An inquiry into the historical foundations of "Information Ethics" in LIS professional practice. Library and Information Sciences, 18(2): 69-102. (in Persian)
26. Shekari M. R., Navah A., and Hashemi I. (2022). Designing a conceptual model of public libraries as community centers based on the public sphere theory of Jürgen Habermas. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 28 (4): 420-446. (in Persian)
27. Soltani-Nejad N., Jahanshahi M., Saberi M. K., Ansari N. and Zarei-Maram N. (2021). The relationship between social responsibility and public libraries' accountability: The mediating role of professional ethics and conscientiousness. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 54 (2): 306-324. [DOI:10.1177/09610006211014260]
28. Stevenson S. (2010). Michel Aglietta and regulation theory. In: Gloria J. Leckie, Lisa M. Given, and John E. Buschman (Eds.), Critical Theory in Library and Information Science, Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 1-14. [DOI:10.5040/9798400634420.ch-001]
29. Umapathy K. S. (1978). Libraries and librarianship in Iran. International Library Review, 10(2), 119-135. [DOI:10.1016/0020-7837(78)90046-8]
30. Vakkari P., Aabø S., Audunson R., Huysmans F. and Oomes M. (2014). Perceived outcomes of public libraries in Finland, Norway and the Netherlands. Journal of Documentation, 70(5): 927-944. [DOI:10.1108/JD-06-2013-0072]
31. Widdersheim M. M. (2015). Governance, legitimation, commons: A public sphere framework and research agenda for the public library sector. LIBRI, 65(4): 237-245. [DOI:10.1515/libri-2015-0043]
32. Widdersheim M. M. and Koizumi, M. (2015). Conceptual modelling of the public sphere in public libraries. In: iConference 2015 Proceedings. Retrieved August 6, 2023, from: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/73882/bitstreams/195264/data.pdf
33. Widdersheim M. M. (2017). Late, lost, or renewed? A search for the public sphere in public libraries. Information Research, 22(1), CoLIS paper 1644. Retrieved August 6, 2023, from: http://InformationR.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1644.html
34. Wood E. (2021). Libraries full circle: The cross section of community, the public sphere, and third place. Public Library Quarterly, 40(2): 144-166. [DOI:10.1080/01616846.2020.1737491]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
