Research on Information Science and Public Libraries

What is information? with an Emphasis on Zins’s Views

Document Type : Original Article

Author

GholamReza Fadaei

Prof., Department of KIS, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore some important views and theories of information and knowledge in the area of library and information science (LIS) and then to propose a new model of information and knowledge.
Method: This research has been conducted by using a comparative content analysis of the existing materials on conceptualizations and definitions of information and knowledge and delving into them.
Findings: In the present paper, the author considers different ideas about the information and then proposes a new model. According to this new model, information is the human’s intentional attention to the relationship between the components of a phenomenon (i.e. entity) or process, or between a phenomenon/process and other phenomena/processes in the world. According to this view, all phenomena and processes exist ontologically. Our attention to them is existent too, but they are different from their physical existence. Furthermore, according to this model, information is based on the external reality which is outside our minds. They are not our information because we have not made them. They are God’s knowledge and information. When they are in the presence of us, directly or indirectly, they are our information. In this case, we may acquire knowledge of the relationships between their components. This is our real information of which our minds take pictures immediately in order to be used in the absence of phenomena. This second position is mental perception which is based on the first one, not vice versa. From this time, when we want to use information or transmit it to others, we have to make signs and symbols of them which comprise tokens, words, sentences or pictures. From here, the domain of epistemology begins, which though based on the reality may be influenced by our mental, historical and cultural conceptions. Thus our given names or comments may differ from one another. These differences cannot affect and question the very realities. If we accept this model, there is no need to omit nonphysical phenomena from the information definition. Metaphysics is the other side of physics, except God who is the creator of both physics and metaphysics. In other words, the world consists of physics and metaphysics, or known and unknown. As science and experience grows, many unknowns become known. Moreover, our knowledge of things in itself is metaphysical. In addition, when we make a whole by observing similar individual phenomena, and then abstract a universal (i.e. a characteristic or property that particular things have in common) from that whole, this universal is somehow metaphysical. Meaning is nonphysical or metaphysics too. Although this model originates from human, it has not originated from his mind. Knowing the outer reality is an indication of our soul's ability to create information. Man knows a phenomenon, but psychological matters are not involved in the knowledge and perception of the very phenomenon. Furthermore, in ontological terms, this model is not based on propositions, but it is for the transmission of information to others that one has to make propositions. Here, our propositions do not affect the real facts, but only show our perceptions and interpretations.
Originality/value: Such analysis has not been conducted thus far, and thus if it is fully considered, it can change our views about the phenomena and the creation of the world, mind and matter, both ontologically and epistemologically.

Keywords

Information
Knowledge
Conceptual critique of information and knowledge
Zins
Soul
۱. ادگار، اندرو؛ و سجویک، پیتر (۱۳۸۸). مفاهیم کلیدی در نظریه فرهنگی (ناصرالدین علی نقویان، مترجم). تهران: پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی (نشر اثر اصلی ۲۰۰۵).
۲. ارسطو (۱۳۸۹). درباره نفس (علیمراد داودی، مترجم). تهران: حکمت.
۳. تردینیک، لوک (۱۳۹۵). بسترهای اطلاعات دیجیتال: رهیافت‌های نظری برای فهم اطلاعات دیجیتال (علی فارسی‌نژاد، مترجم). تهران: چاپار، نهاد کتابخانه‌های عمومی کشور.
۴. خندان، محمد؛ و فدایی، غلامرضا (۱۳۸۷). نگاهی به پارادایم‌های سهگانۀ مدرن در اطلاع‌شناسی. تحقیقات اطلاع‌رسانی و کتابخانه‌های عمومی، ۱۴(۳)، ۳۰-۳.
۵. خندان، محمد؛ و فدایی، غلامرضا (۱۳۸۸). نگاهی به مبادی و مسائل فلسفۀ اطلاعات لوچیانو فلوریدی. پژوهش‌های فلسفی-کلامی، ١٠(٣)، ۵-٣٩.
۶. سجادی، سیدجعفر (۱۳۸۶). فرهنگ اصطلاحات فلسفی ملاصدرا. تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
۷. فدایی، غلامرضا (۱۳۸۷). علم و ادراک و نحوه تشکیل آن. معرفت فلسفی، ۶(۲)، ۲۲، ۱۶۳-۱۳۱.
۸. فدایی، غلامرضا (۱۳۸۸). نگاهی به نفس، و ذهن و نقش آن‌ها در ادراک. معرفت فلسفی، ۷(۲)، ۲۶، ۷۰-۴۱.
۹. فدایی، غلامرضا (١٣٨۹). مقدمه‌ای بر هویت کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی. تهران: نهاد کتابخانه‌های عمومی کشور.
۱۰. فدایی، غلامرضا (۱۳۹۵). جستارهایی در هستی‌شناسی و معرفت‌شناسی. تهران: امیرکبیر.
۱۱. کاپلستون، فردریک (١٣٨٨). تاریخ فلسفه (فیلسوفان انگلیسی) (ج. ۵) (امیرجلال‌الدین اعلم، مترجم). تهران: سروش (نشر اثر اصلی ۱۹۸۵).
۱۲. کرد فیروزجایی، یارعلی (۱۳۸۶). فلسفۀ فرگه. قم: مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی.
۱۳. گیرو، پی‌یر (۱۳۹۸). نشانه‌شناسی (محمد نبوی، مترجم). تهران: آگه (نشر اثر اصلی ۱۹۷۳).
۱۴. مرادی، خدیجه؛ غائبی، امیر؛ و کربلائی آقایی کامران، معصومه (۱۳۹۹). تعریف اطلاعات از لنز نشانه‌شناسی و الگوی سه‌وجهی پیرس، مروری بر مهم‌ترین پژوهش‌های انجام‌شده در این حوزه. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، ۱۰(۲)، ۲۳-۵.
۱۵. موسوی، سیدابراهیم (۱۳۸۷). ادراک حسی افلاطون در نظام پامنیدسی. حکمت و فلسفه، ۴(۴). ۲۶-۹.
۱۶. هایدگر، مارتین (۱۳۸۹). هستی و زمان (عبدالکریم رشیدیان، مترجم). تهران: نشر نی (نشر اثر اصلی ۱۹۲۷).
17. Buckland, M. K. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for information science, 42(5), 351-360.
18. Capurro, R., & Hjorland, B. (2003). The Concept of Information. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 37(1), 341-411.
19. Debons, A., Horne, E., & Cronenweth, S. (1988). Information science: An integrated view. GK Hall.
20. Fadaie, G. (2009). The LIS Discipline or Retrieval of Information: A Theoretical Viewpoint. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 6, 575-583.
21. Floridi, L. (2003). Two approaches to the philosophy of information. Minds and Machines, 13(4), 459-469.
22. Floridi, L. (2008). Trends in the philosophy of information. Philosophy of information, 8, 113-131.
23. Kleineberg, M. (2014). The blind men and the elephant: towards an organization of epistemic contexts. Knowledge Organization (KO), 40(5), 340-364.
24. Poli, R. (2001). ALWIS: Ontology for Knowledge Engineers. unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Utrecht. The Netherlands.
25. Russell, S, J; Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Prentice Hall Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.).
26. Thornton, S. (2019). "Karl Popper", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/popper
27. Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 58(4), 479-493.
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries
Volume 26, Issue 2
Summer 2020
Pages 242-215

Home

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us