Research on Information Science and Public Libraries

The Role of Organizational Trust in the Transfer of Tacit Knowledge (Case Study: Public Libraries of Fars Province)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Ali Biranvand 1
Maryam Golshani 2
Reza Akbarnejad 3
Zahra Rafiee 4

1 Assistant Prof., Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Student of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Iran

3 Assistant Prof., Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

4 MSc in Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Iran

Abstract
Purpose: One of the challenges facing public libraries is the use of staff tacit knowledge. In this study, the effect of organizational trust (calculus-based trust, knowledge-based trust, and identity-based trust components) on the transfer of tacit knowledge of staff of Fars Province public library in Iran was investigated.
Method: The present study is an applied research that has collected information by using a descriptive method. The statistical population of this research included all employees of public libraries in Fars province in 2021 (350 people), from 184 individuals were selected as the statistical sample of the research through using simple random sampling method. A questionnaire taken from Fuller’s research (2018) was used to collect data. The independent variable in this research is organizational trust, which includes calculus-based trust, knowledge-based trust, and identity-based trust components. The dependent variable is the transfer of tacit knowledge, which includes two components: the desire to share and the desire to use tacit knowledge. The validity of the questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha and combined reliability. In order to investigate the effect of organizational trust on the transfer of tacit knowledge, confirmatory factor analysis and partial least squares technique were applied. Furthermore, SPSS and PLS software were used for statistical analysis.
Findings: The results show that the value of t-statistic, in relation to the effect of calculus-based trust on the willingness to share and use of tacit knowledge, is 2.39 and 2.87, respectively. Therefore, calculus-based trust has a positive and significant effect on the transfer of tacit knowledge. Regarding the effect of knowledge-based trust on the tendency to share and apply tacit knowledge, t-statistics are 4.94 and 6.35, respectively. Therefore, knowledge-based trust has a positive and significant effect on the transfer of tacit knowledge. Moreover, regarding the effect of identity-based trust on the tendency to share and apply tacit knowledge, t-statistics are 7.11 and 4.38, respectively. Therefore, identity-based trust has a positive and significant effect on the transfer of tacit knowledge. Furthermore, identity-based trust has a stronger effect on the tendency to share knowledge than sensory and knowledge-based trust. Calculus-based trust, knowledge-based trust, and identity-based trust have a positive and significant effect on employees’ willingness to use tacit knowledge.
Originality/value: The transfer of tacit knowledge is an interactive process that is basically based on trust between the parties. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the role of organizational trust in the transfer of tacit knowledge in a comprehensive and accurate manner in order to identify and remove potential barriers in this area. The results of the present study help the managers of public libraries to establish organizational trust in the relations between individuals and groups of employees, and provide the ground for the transfer of tacit knowledge in public libraries.

Keywords

Tacit knowledge transfer
Calculus-based trust
Knowledge-based trust
Identity-based trust
۱. بیرانوند، علی؛ شعبانی، احمد؛ و استانی محمدی، مرتضی. (۱۳۹۶). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر تسهیم دانش کتابداران و ارائۀ مدل پیش‌بینی رفتار آن‌ها (مطالعۀ موردی: کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان فارس). مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات، ۹(۱)، ۳۹-۶۰.
۲. ‌‫بیرانوند، علی؛ و صیف، محمدحسن. (۱۳۹۸). بررسی تأثیر عوامل مؤثر بر قصد تسهیم دانش. رهیافت، ۲۸(۷۲)، ۴۷-۶۰.‬‬‬‬‬‬
۳. ‌‫کبیری، افشار؛ قلعه‌ای، علیرضا؛ طالبی، معصومه؛ و شیخلو، مریم. (۱۳۹۸). رابطۀ میان ابعاد اخلاقی معنویت در محیط کار با سلامت سازمانی و اعتماد سازمانی. اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، ۱۴(۲)، ۸۳-۹۰.‬‬‬‬‬‬
۴. ‫مظفری، لیلا؛ و جوکار، طاهره (۱۳۹۹). اشتراک‌گذاری دانش پنهان در میان کتابداران کتابخانه‌های عمومی: مطالعۀ موردی استان فارس. تحقیقات اطلاع‌رسانی و کتابخانه‌های عمومی، ۲۶(۱)، ۱۷-۴۳.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬
۵. منصوری، حسین؛ و دانیالی ده‌حوض، محمود (۱۳۹۸). مطالعۀ اثر تعدیل‌کنندگی بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی در رابطۀ بین اعتماد سازمانی و رفتار شهروندی سازمانی. تحقیقات اطلاع‌رسانی و کتابخانه‌های عمومی، ۲۵(۳)، ۴۸۳-۵۱۰.
۶. نیلی‌پور طباطبایی، اکبر؛ تقسیمی، جمشید؛ و فاطمی، طیبه. (۱۳۹۷). ارائۀ مدل مدیریت دانش با رویکرد قابلیت یادگیری سازمانی (مطالعۀ موردی: شهرداری اصفهان). دانش شناسی، ۱۱(۴۰)، ۱۵–۲۷.‬‬‬‬‬
7. Adler, Paul S. (2001). Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117
8. Al Qeisi, Kholoud I; & Al Zagheer, Hanadi M. (2015). Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviour among personnel in banking industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 49.
9. Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2012). Assessing and managing organizational climate in healthcare organizations: An intellectual capital based perspective. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), 4(4), 49–61.
10. Curado, C., & Vieira, S. (2019). Trust, knowledge sharing and organizational commitment in SMEs. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2018-0094
11. Fuller, L. P. (2018). Trust: A Pathway to Overcome Tacit Knowledge Transfer Barriers. (Doctoral dissertation, Trident University International)
12. Ishrat, R, & Rahman, W. (2019). Factors of knowledge sharing: a literature review. Sarhad Journal of Management Sciences, 5(2), 219-254.
13. Islam, M. A., Ikeda, M., & Islam, M. M. (2013). Knowledge sharing behaviour influences: A study of Information Science and Library Management faculties in Bangladesh. IFLA Journal, 39(3), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035213497674
14. Jiang, H., & Luo, Y. (2018). Crafting employee trust: from authenticity, transparency to engagement. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-07-2016-0055
15. Kakhki, M. K., Hadadian, A., Joyame, E. N., & Asl, N. M. (2020). Understanding librarians’ knowledge sharing behavior: The role of organizational climate, motivational drives and leadership empowerment. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100998
16. Kaffashan Kakhki, M., Rajabi, M., Naji, A., AsemanDoreh, Y., & Harati, H. (2020). The Effect of Job and Motivation on the Knowledge Sharing of Librarians in Public Libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 39(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2019.1585218
17. Kim, E., & Park, S. (2020). Employees’ perceptions of organizational learning: the role of knowledge and trust. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2020-0169
18. Kremer, H., Villamor, I., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Business Horizons, 62(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.010
19. Kumaresan, S. C., & Swrooprani, B. S. (2013). Knowledge sharing and factors influencing sharing in libraries—a pilot study on the knowledge sharing attributes of the education city library community in qatar. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 12(01), 1350007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021964921350007X
20. Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2018). The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0463
21. Lin, H. F. (2006). Impact of organizational support on organizational intention to facilitate knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(1), 26-35.
22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500083
23. Lucas, L. M. (2005). The impact of trust and reputation on the transfer of best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510610350
24. Omeihe, K. O., Amoako, I. O., Gustafsson, V., Khan, M. S., & Omeihe, I. (2020). Getting Personal: the issues of trust and distrust in small and medium-sized enterprises in Nigeria. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 0(0), 1-20.
25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2020.1836550
26. Oulabi, Y., & Bizer, C. (2017). Estimating missing temporal meta-information using Knowledge-Based-Trust. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 1959, pp. Paper-4). RWTH.
27. Phong, L. B., Hui, L., & Son, T. T. (2018). How leadership and trust in leaders foster employees' behavior toward knowledge sharing. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(5), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6711
28. Top, S. (2012). Assessing the knowledge sharing in terms of risk level in-house service sector assisted with logistic regression model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 802-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1058
29. Wei, J., Zheng, W., & Zhang, M. (2011). Social capital and knowledge transfer: A multi-level analysis. Human Relations, 64(11), 1401-1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711417025
30. Yadav, R. S., Dash, S. S., Chakraborty, S., & Kumar, M. (2018). Perceived CSR and corporate reputation: the mediating role of employee trust. Vikalpa, 43(3), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090918794823
31. Yuan, X., Olfman, L., & Yi, J. (2020). How do institution-based trust and interpersonal trust affect interdepartmental knowledge sharing?. In Information Diffusion Management and Knowledge Sharing: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 424-451). IGI Global.
32. Zhao, N., Shi, Y., Xin, Z., & Zhang, J. (2019). The impact of traditionality/modernity on identification‐and calculus‐based trust. International Journal of Psychology, 54(2), 237-246.
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries
Volume 27, Issue 2
Summer 2021
Pages 358-327

Home

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us