Research on Information Science and Public Libraries

Studying the Viewpoints of Librarians and Users about the Challenges and Strategies for User Participation in Library Activities and Services: A Case Study of Public Libraries in Bandar Abbas

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Samaneh Ghoraishi Maromi 1
Javad Abbaspour 2
Mohammad Hasan Karimi 3

1 MSc in Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

3 Assistant Prof., Department of Basics of Education, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

10.52547/publij.27.4.679
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to identify the viewpoints of Bandar Abbas public libraries librarians and users about the challenges and strategies of users’ participation in public library activities and services.
Method: The methodology used in this research is qualitative. The potential partners of this study include 20 librarians in five Bandar Abbas public libraries and users of these libraries. For data collection, semi-structured interviews were used. After interviewing with 11 librarians and 11 users, the interview ended since theoretical saturation was reached. In order to ensure the accuracy and validity of the questions prepared for the interview, assistance was sought from three faculty members of knowledge and information science. To ensure the reliability of interview data, the directive interview technique was used and the members of research committee evaluated and examined the interview data.
Findings: By analyzing the interviews, the basic themes for the concept of user participation in library, the challenges facing users and their solutions for participation were presented. Eight basic themes were elicited for the concept of user participation in library which was categorized into two components: affectionate and organizing, and negative organizing. Affectionate component included a functional interaction in both theoretical and practical fields. Theoretical interaction involves include the three basic themes of consultation and brainstorm, sharing ideas and solidarity. Interaction in the field of practice includes the three themes of voluntary cooperation in executive affairs, two-way relationship, constructive and beneficial and profitability through synergy of forces.  For clarifying the challenges of user participation on libraries, 26 themes were elicited and categorized into 4 organizing themes: financial challenges, structural challenges, challenges of interpersonal and organizational relationships, and the challenges resulting from lack of awareness. Furthermore, user participation strategies were elicited in the form of 21 basic themes and 3 themes which include: financial solutions, structural solutions, and interpersonal and organizational solutions. Most of the librarians and users participating in this research believe that user participation has a great impact on advancement of library, and consider it useful for library, librarians and users. However, there are limitations and obstacles in the way of users’ participation in libraries. One can conclude that the ultimate solution to the challenges associated with user participation in libraries is to institutionalize community-based librarianship.
Originality/value: Among the most important contributions of this research are to understand the phenomenon of user participation in the activities and services of public libraries as well as to understand the challenges and strategies of user participation in these activities.

Keywords

Libraries services
Public library
User participation
۱. امیدخدا، مریم؛ اباذری، زهرا؛ میرحسینی، زهره؛ و حریری، نجلا (۱۳۹۹). تعیین مناسب‌ترین نوع برنامه‌ریزی به‌منظور طراحی فعالیت‌های فرهنگی کتابخانه‌های عمومی. تحقیقات اطلاع رسانی و کتابخانه‌های عمومی، ۲۶(۱): ۱۳۹-۱۵۷.
۲. طوسی، محمدعلی(۱۳۷۸). مشارکت در مدیریت و مالکیت. تهران: انتشارات مرکز آموزش مدیریت دولتی.
۳. غفاری، غلامرضا؛ و دهقان، علیرضا (۱۳۸۰). تبیین مشارکت اجتماعی فرهنگی دانشجویان علوم پزشکی شهر تهران. مجله جامعه‌شناسی ایران، ۶(۱)، ۶۷-۹۸.
4. Aabo, S., Audunson, R. & Vårheim, A. (2010). How do public libraries function as meeting places? Library & information science, 32. 16-26.
5. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
6. Blackburn, F. (2014). An example of community engagement: Libraries ACT and the ACT Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 45(2), 121-138.
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
8. Goulding, A. (2009). Engaging with community engagement: public libraries and citizen involvement. New Library World, 110(1-2), 37-51.
9. Huvila, I. (2020). Librarians on User Participation in Five European Countries/Perspectives de bibliothécaires sur la participation des utilisateurs dans cinq pays européens. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 43(2), 127-157.
10. Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C. (2016). The participatory public library: the Nordic experience. New Library World, 117(9/10), 546–556.
11. Kassel, A. (1999). How to write a marketing plan, Marketing Library Services, 13(5), 4-6.
12. Kranich, N. (2012). Libraries and Civic Engagement. Library and Book Trade Almanac, 75-96.
13. Lankes,R.D. and Silverstein,J.(2006).participatory network: the library as conversation, American library association,Chicago,IL.
14. Putnam, R. D., Feldstein, L. M., & Cohen, D. (2003). Better together: Restoring the American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
15. Reid, H., & Howard, V. (2016). Connecting with community: The importance of community engagement in rural public library systems. Public Library Quarterly, 35(3), 188-202.
16. Richards, A., & Sen, B. (2013). An investigation into the viability of LibraryThing for promotional and user engagement purposes in libraries. Library Hi Tech, 31(3), 493-519.
17. Rogers, B. M., & Robinson, E. (2004). The benefits of community engagement: a review of the evidence. London: Active Citizenship Centre.
18. Scott, R. (2011). The role of public libraries in community building. Public Library Quarterly, 30(3), 191–227.
19. Simon, N (2010). The participatory Museum, Museum2.0, Santa Cruz.
20. Sung, H., and M. Hepworth., (2013). Modelling community engagement in public libraries. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 18(1), 1-13.
21. Sung, H., Hepworth, M. & Ragsdell, G. (2013). Investigating essential elements of community 45 engagement in public libraries: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship Information Science (3), 206–18.
22. Tammaro, A. M. (2016). Participatory Approaches and Innovation in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums. International Information & Library Review, 48(1), 37–44.
23. Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2000). Citizen participation and community organizations. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 247–272). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Wedgeworth, R. (2000). Donor relations as public relations: Toward a philosophy of fundraising. Library Trends, 48(3), 530-539.
25. Willingham, T. L. (2008). Libraries as civic agents. Public Library Quarterly, 27(2), 97-110.
26. Zou, H., Chen, H. M., & Dey, S. (2015). Exploring user engagement strategies and their impacts with social media mining: the case of public libraries. Journal of Management Analytics, 2(4), 295-313.
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries
Volume 27, Issue 4
Winter 2022
Pages 706-679

Home

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us