1. آذر، عادل؛ غلامزاده، رسول؛ و قنواتی، مهدی (1391). مدلسازی مسیری-ساختاری در مدیریت: کاربرد نرمافزار SmartPLS. تهران: نگاه دانش.
2. امیدواریان، مرضیه (1385). شناسایی فاکتورهای مؤثر در اجرای مدیریت ارتباط با مشتری در صنایع خدماتی: موردکاوی صنعت هتلداری ایران (پایاننامۀ کارشناسیارشد). دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
3. حنفیزاده، پیام؛ اسدی، جعفر؛ و خدمتگذار، حمیدرضا (1391). عوامل مؤثر در پذیرش بانکداری اینترنتی (مطالعۀ موردی: بانک اقتصاد نوین). مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت، 28(1)، 98-87.
4. حیدری، غلامرضا؛ علیزاده اقدم، محمدباقر؛ و حمدیپور، افشین (1392). عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش منابع اطلاعاتی الکترونیکی توسط اعضای هیئتعلمی رشتۀ علم اطلاعات و دانششناسی دانشگاههای ایران بر اساس نظریۀ اشاعۀ نوآوری راجرز. کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی، 16(3)، 144-123.
5. خدامی، سهیلا؛ نوروزی، حسین؛ و مروتی شانجانی، مهسا (1396). بررسی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر استفاده مصرفکنندگان از تبلیغات موبایلی مبتنی بر نظریه یکپارچه پذیرش و استفاده از تکنولوژی (UTAUT). تحقیقات بازاریابی نوین، 7(4)، 194-173.
6. خنیفر، حسین (1387). پیشینه و ادبیات نظری پژوهش: روزنهای به دنیای پژوهش. پرسمان، (67).
7. دلاور، علی (1384). مبانی نظری و عملی پژوهش در علوم انسانی و اجتماعی. تهران: انتشارات رشد.
8. سلیمیفرد، خداکرم؛ خسروی، عبدالرسول؛ پاک، امید؛ پاسبان، اسماعیل؛ و صفایی، زهرا (1393). مدلسازی عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش فناوری آر.اف.آی.دی در کتابخانه (نمونۀ موردی: کتابخانۀ دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بوشهر). تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی دانشگاهی، 48(1)، 120-105.
9. فرزین یزدی، محبوبه؛ برادر، رویا؛ و غائبی، امیر (1392). بررسی قابلیت کاربرد «مدل پذیرش فناوری» برای پذیرش فناوری آر.اف.آی.دی. در کتابخانههای دانشگاهی (موردکاوی: شهر یزد). تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی دانشگاهی، 47(2)، 171-189.
10. قوچانی، فروغ؛ و بدریزاده، مریم (1390). بررسی تأثیر فرهنگ سازمانی بر استقرار سیستمهای اطلاعات. چشمانداز مدیریت دولتی، 2(3)، 54-42.
11. مکیزاده، فاطمه؛ فرج پهلو، عبدالحسین؛ عصاره، فریده؛ و شهنی ییلاق، منیجه (1391). شناسایی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر پذیرش پایگاههای اطلاعاتی مبتنی بر وب توسط کاربران دانشگاهی: یک مطالعۀ گراندد تئوری. تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی دانشگاهی، 59(1)، 81-59.
13. Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S., & Wang, J. (2007). Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Information & Management, 44(8), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.09.002
14. Al-Qeisi, K. I. (2009). Analyzing the use of UTAUT model in explaining an online behaviour: Internet banking adoption (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University Brunel Business School PhD Theses).
15. Anderson, J. E., Schwager, P. H., & Kerns, R. L. (2006). The drivers for acceptance of tablet PCs by faculty in a college of business. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(4), 429.
16. Avdic, A., & Eklund, A. (2010). Searching reference databases: What students experience and what teachers believe that students experience. Journal of librarianship and information science, 42(4), 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000610380119
17. Azar, A., Gholamzadeh, R., & Ghanavati, M. (2012). Path-structural modeling in management: Applications of the SmartPLS software. Tehran: Negah-e Danesh.
18. Bandyopadhyay, K., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2010). User acceptance of information technology across cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Information Management, 2(3), 218-231.
19. Bhatiasevi, V. (2016). An extended UTAUT model to explain the adoption of mobile banking. Information Development, 32(4), 799-814.
20. Birch, A., & Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model. Educational media international, 46(4), 295-315.
21. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 136-162.
22. Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvonen, K., Puhakainen, J., & Walden, P. (2006, January). Adoption of mobile devices/services-searching for answers with the UTAUT. In Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS'06) (Vol. 6, pp. 132a-132a). IEEE.
23. Carter, L., & Schaupp, L. C. (2009). Relating acceptance and optimism to e-file adoption. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 5(3), 62-74.
24. Chen, Y. C. (2008). Citizen-centric E-government: Understanding Integrated Citizen Service Systems. Social Science Computer Review, 28(4), 427–442.
25. Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K. L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public relations review, 36(1), 90-92.
26. Dada, D. (2006). E‐Readiness for Developing Countries: Moving the focus from the environment to the users. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 27(1), 1-14.
27. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
28. Di Pietro, L., Mugion, R. G., Mattia, G., Renzi, M. F., & Toni, M. (2015). The integrated model on mobile payment acceptance (IMMPA): an empirical application to public transport. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 56, 463-479.
29. Dulle, F. W., & Minishi-Majanja, M. K. (2011). The suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies. Information development, 27(1), 32-45.
30. Günther, O., Krasnova, H., Riehle, D., & Schöndienst, V. (2009). V.: Modeling Microblogging Adoption in the Enterprise. In Proceedings of 15th Americas Conference of Information Systems (AMCIS), 544.
31. Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 140-154.
32. Henderson, Kira M. (2015). Reproducibility in science: How video journals increase research validity and productivity. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 47, 2.
33. Hsu, C. L., Chen, M. C., Lin, Y. H., Chang, K. C., & Hsieh, A. Y. (2014, April). Adopting the extension of UTAUT model to investigate the determinants of e-book adoption. In 2014 International Conference on Information Science, Electronics and Electrical Engineering (Vol. 1, pp. 669-673). IEEE.
34. Huang, K. Y., Choi, N., & Chengalur-Smith, I. N. (2010). Cultural Dimensions as Moderators of the UTAUT Model: A Research Proposal in a Healthcare Context. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (p. 188).
35. Jalaldeen, R., Karim, S. A., & Mohamed, N. (2009). Organizational readiness and its contributing factors to adopt KM processes: A conceptual model. Communications of the IBIMA, 8, 128-136.
36. Jamaludin, A., & Mahmud, Z. (2011). Intention to use digital library based on modified UTAUT model: Perspectives of Malaysian postgraduate students. International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering, 5(3), 270-276.
37. Jewitt, C (2012). An Introduction to Using Video for Research. NCRM Working Paper. NCRM. (Unpublished). Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2259/4/NCRM_workingpaper_0312.pdf
38. Jong, D., & Wang, T. S. (2009). Student acceptance of web-based learning system. In Proceedings. The 2009 International Symposium on Web Information Systems and Applications (WISA 2009) (p. 533). Academy Publisher.
39. Jove (2019). Retrieved from https://www.jove.com/institutions/AS-asia
40. Keller, C., Hrastinski, S., & Carlsson, S. A. (2007). Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Environments: A comparative study in Sweden and Lithuania. In the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, St Gallen, 2007 (pp. 395-406). University of St. Gallen.
41. Körkel, T., & Hoppenhaus, K. (2016). Web Video Wissenschaft. Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. Retrieved from https://www. spektrum. de/fm/976/Web% 20Video% 20Wissenschaft% 20Version% 201_02. pdf
42. Kumar, C. (2008). Research methodology. New Delhi: APH Pub. Corp.
43. Kumar, A. (2009). Who gambles in the stock market?. The Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1889-1933.
44. Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2010). Electronic human resources management in an e-business environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(4), 240.
45. Lee, C. L., Yen, D. C., Peng, K. C., & Wu, H. C. (2010). The influence of change agents' behavioral intention on the usage of the activity based costing/management system and firm performance: The perspective of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Advances in Accounting, 26(2), 314-324.
46. Li, J. P., & Kishore, R. (2006, April). How robust is the UTAUT instrument? A multigroup invariance analysis in the context of acceptance and use of online community weblog systems. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: Forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges & the future (pp. 183-189).
47. Li, W. (2010). Virtual knowledge sharing in a cross-cultural context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 38-50.
48. Liu, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2008, July). An adoption model for mobile learning. In Proceeding for the IADIS international Conference e-Commerce (pp. 251-256).
49. Lopresti, Michael J. (2011). Academic Publisher Builds its ‘Legacy’ With Streaming Video. Academic Publisher, 22.
50. Louho, R., Kallioja, M., & Oittinen, P. (2006). Factors affecting the use of hybrid media applications. Graphic arts in Finland, 35(3), 11-21.
51. Medhi, I., Ratan, A., & Toyama, K. (2009, July). Mobile-banking adoption and usage by low-literate, low-income users in the developing world. In International conference on internationalization, design and global development (pp. 485-494). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
52. Madigan, R., Louw, T., Dziennus, M., Graindorge, T., Ortega, E., Graindorge, M., & Merat, N. (2016). Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): an adaptation of the UTAUT model. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2217-2226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.237
53. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
54. Neufeld, D. J., Dong, L., & Higgins, C. (2007). Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 494-510.
55. Nistor, N., Wagner, M., Istvanffy, E., & Dragota, M. (2010). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Verifying the model from a European perspective. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 6(2-3), 185-199.
56. Nov, O., & Ye, C. (2009). Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: An integrative model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1702-1708.
57. Omidvarian, M. (2006). Identifying Effective Factors on Customer Relationship Management Implementation in Service Industries: case study: Iran hospitality industry (Master's thesis). Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
58. Patterson, F., Cousans, F., Edwards, H., Rosselli, A., Nicholson, S., & Wright, B. (2017). The predictive validity of a text-based situational judgment test in undergraduate medical and dental school admissions. Academic medicine, 92(9), 1250-1253.
59. Pink, S. (2003). Representing the sensory home: ethnographic experience and anthropological hypermedia. Social Analysis, 47(3), 46-63.
60. Pritsker, M. (2015). How video publication of laboratory experiments will solve the reproducibility problem: The Journal of Visualized Experiments. Information Services & Use, 35(3), 181-184.
61. Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for academic purposes, 7(2), 121-132.
62. Sharma, A., & Citurs, A. (2004). Incorporating personality into UTAUT: individual differences and user acceptance of IT. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, 421.
63. Srite, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Galy, E. (2008). Does within-culture variation matter? An empirical study of computer usage. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 16(1), 1-25.
64. Suhendra, E. S., Hermana, B., & Sugiharto, T. (2009, June). Behavioral analysis of information technology acceptance in Indonesia small enterprises. In Anadolu International Conference in Economics (pp. 17-19).
65. Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. (2017). Determining students’ behavioural intention to use animation and storytelling applying the UTAUT model: The moderating roles of gender and experience level. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(3), 528-538.
66. Taksa, I., & Flomenbaum, J. M. (2009, April). An integrated framework for research on cross-cultural information retrieval. In 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (pp. 1367-1372). IEEE.
67. Tavares, A., & Amaral, L. (2010, October). Adoption of authenticated peer-to-peer academic networks–a case study of a failure. In International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems (pp. 345-354). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
68. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers (p. 60). Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
69. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312.
70. Teo, A. C., Tan, G. W. H., Cheah, C. M., Ooi, K. B., & Yew, K. T. (2012). Can the demographic and subjective norms influence the adoption of mobile banking?. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 10(6), 578-597.
71. Tibenderana, K. G. P. (2010). A model for measuring levels of end-users' acceptance and use of hybrid library services and its applicability to universities (Doctoral dissertation), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
72. Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2010). An assessment of customers’e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention. International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), 481-492.
73. Van Schaik, P. (2009). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use for Websites Used by Students in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(2), 229-257.
74. Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838-852.
75. Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 639-656.
76. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS quarterly, 115-139.
77. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
78. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS quarterly, 32, 483-502.
79. Vongjaturapat, S., Chaveesuk, S., Chotikakamthorn, N., & Tongkhambanchong, S. (2015). Analysis of factor influencing the tablet acceptance for library information services: A combination of UTAUT and TTF Model. Journal of information & knowledge management, 14(03), 1550023.
80. Wang, H. I., & Yang, H. L. (2005). The role of personality traits in UTAUT model under online stocking. Contemporary management research, 1(1), 69-82.
81. Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443-488.
82. Wong, C. H., Tan, G. W. H., Tan, B. I., & Ooi, K. B. (2015). Mobile advertising: the changing landscape of the advertising industry. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 720-734.
83. Yang, X., Zhang, X., Li, Z., & He, G. W. (2009). A smoothing technique for discrete delta functions with application to immersed boundary method in moving boundary simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(20), 7821-7836.
84. Yu, C. S. (2012). Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Journal of electronic commerce research, 13(2), 104-121.
85. Zainab, A. M., Kiran, K., Karim, N. H. A., & Sukmawati, M. (2018). UTAUT’S performance consistency: Empirical evidence from a library management system. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 23(1), 17-32.