Volume 28, Issue 1 (5-2022)
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2022, 28(1): 52-73 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Malek-Zadeh M, Zavareghi R, Atapour H. Investigating the Administrative Structure of the Board of Trustees of US Public Libraries in order to Provide a Model for Use in Public Library Associations of Iran. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2022; 28 (1) :52-73
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2304-en.html
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2304-en.html
Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Education, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran , rs.zavaraqi@gmail.com
Abstract: (1929 Views)
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the administrative structure of the board of trustees of US public libraries in order to provide a model for use in public library associations of Iran.
Method: The present research is an applied study in terms of purpose and is a quantitative and qualitative analysis in terms of methodology. To answer research questions about US public libraries, the laws and guidelines of the board of trustees of US public libraries were used. Websites of www.publiclibraries.com, and www.ala.org, and search engines and social networks were used to identify the libraries under study and the persons, authorities and structures of each library.
Findings: The findings show that the board of trustees of US public libraries focus more on financial, administrative, human and policy issues; Topics related to community relations, formal and legal social assemblies, participation, coordination and cooperation among boards, associations and assemblies, educational and workshop topics, monitoring contracts, and so on have also recently been added to this type of tasks; In the composition of their members, there is a variety of duties and responsibilities in different geographical areas; Their duties and powers are more detailed and realistic and represent the local face more vividly; There is no defined procedure for appointing or electing their board of trustees, and the procedure for appointing board members of public libraries in each state is almost different from other states; Most of their members are real members; Most of their members work in non-profit organizations; Most of their members are women; Furthermore, the average age of their members was 47 years.
Conclusion: it is suggested that the administrative structure of public libraries in Iran be changed based on the administrative structure of public libraries in other countries in such a way that they should have a balanced mix of local and state support. It is also suggested that Iranian public library associations emphasize more on demographic, gender, age, and occupational diversity of their members. Moreover, new duties and functions should be defined for Iranian public library associations and their powers should be increased. Finally, it is predicted that by taking advantage of the experiences of other countries and consequently increasing the duties and powers of Iranian public library associations, the local aspect of Iranian public libraries will be strengthened, and the decision-making process will be accelerated.
Method: The present research is an applied study in terms of purpose and is a quantitative and qualitative analysis in terms of methodology. To answer research questions about US public libraries, the laws and guidelines of the board of trustees of US public libraries were used. Websites of www.publiclibraries.com, and www.ala.org, and search engines and social networks were used to identify the libraries under study and the persons, authorities and structures of each library.
Findings: The findings show that the board of trustees of US public libraries focus more on financial, administrative, human and policy issues; Topics related to community relations, formal and legal social assemblies, participation, coordination and cooperation among boards, associations and assemblies, educational and workshop topics, monitoring contracts, and so on have also recently been added to this type of tasks; In the composition of their members, there is a variety of duties and responsibilities in different geographical areas; Their duties and powers are more detailed and realistic and represent the local face more vividly; There is no defined procedure for appointing or electing their board of trustees, and the procedure for appointing board members of public libraries in each state is almost different from other states; Most of their members are real members; Most of their members work in non-profit organizations; Most of their members are women; Furthermore, the average age of their members was 47 years.
Conclusion: it is suggested that the administrative structure of public libraries in Iran be changed based on the administrative structure of public libraries in other countries in such a way that they should have a balanced mix of local and state support. It is also suggested that Iranian public library associations emphasize more on demographic, gender, age, and occupational diversity of their members. Moreover, new duties and functions should be defined for Iranian public library associations and their powers should be increased. Finally, it is predicted that by taking advantage of the experiences of other countries and consequently increasing the duties and powers of Iranian public library associations, the local aspect of Iranian public libraries will be strengthened, and the decision-making process will be accelerated.
Type of Study: quantitative |
Subject:
Management Studies
Received: 2021/09/6 | Accepted: 2022/01/3 | Published: 2022/05/31
Received: 2021/09/6 | Accepted: 2022/01/3 | Published: 2022/05/31
References
1. Aabø, S., Audunson, R., & Vårheim, A. (2010). How do public libraries function as meeting places?. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 16-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.008]
2. American Public Library. Library Trends, 14(11). 55-68.
3. Arns, J. (2007). The leadership characteristics and behaviors valued by public library trustees in times of conflict and contention. The Library Quarterly, 3(77), 287-310. [DOI:10.1086/519415]
4. Christenson, J. (1995). Role of the Public Library Trustee. Library Trends, 44(1), 63-76. [DOI:10.1080/0005772X.1995.11099238]
5. Dain, P. (1996). American public libraries and the third sector: Historical reflections and implications. Libraries & culture, 31(1), 56-84.
6. Elsaid, N. M., Okasha, A. E., & Abdelghaly, A. A. (2013). Defining and Solving the Organizational Structure Problems to Improve the Performanceof Ministry of State for Environmental Affairs-Egypt. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(10), 1-10.
7. Fadaie, G. (2009). The LIS Discipline or Retrieval Of Information: A Theoretical Viewpoint. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 6, 575- 584. [DOI:10.28945/1082]
8. Farrell, M. (2012). A brief history of national support for libraries in the United States. In World Library and Information Congress, IFLA General Conference and Assembly (Vol. 78).
9. Germain, C. M. (1979). France: Libraries of Law and Librarians. Law Libr. J., 72, 235.
10. Gaiman, N. (2013). Why our future depends on libraries, reading and daydreaming. The Guardian, 15.
11. Ghosh, M. (2005). The public library system in India: challenges and opportunities. Library Review, 54(3), 180-191. [DOI:10.1108/00242530510588935]
12. Gill, P. (2001). The public library service: IFLA/UNESCO guidelines for development (Vol. 97). NBD Biblion Publishers. [DOI:10.1515/9783110961959] []
13. Holt, G. E. (2005). Financial responsibilities of library boards. The Bottom Line, 18(3), 133-137. [DOI:10.1108/08880450510613605]
14. Kaur, M., & Chaudhary. CH. P. (2017). Role of Academic and Public Libraries in Democracy. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 7(22). 26-27. [DOI:10.9790/0837-2207022627]
15. Latham, J. M., & Ditzler, W. E. (2010). Collective effort: The American :union: and the American public library. Library trends, 59(1), 237-255. [DOI:10.1353/lib.2010.a407816]
16. Liu, R. (2010). The Value of a Library Advisory Board in a Research Library, Best Practices for Government Libraries 2010, LexisNexis, Washington DC, -1. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/publications/value-library-advisory-board-research-library
17. Neondorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook Sage.
18. Ocholla, D. N., & Le Roux, J. (2011). Conceptions and misconceptions of theoretical frameworks in library and information science research: A case study of selected theses and dissertations from eastern and southern African universities. Mousaion, 29(2), 61-74.
19. Oh, S. (2014). Effects of the discount matrix on e-rate funds from 1998 to 2012. Telecommunications Policy, 38(11), 1069-1084 [DOI:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.06.009]
20. Vakkari, P. (2014). Perceived outcomes of public libraries in Finland, Norway and the Netherlands. Journal of Documentation, 70(5), 11-29 [DOI:10.1108/JD-06-2013-0072]
21. Warner, A. A. (1999). A demographic study of Ohio public library trustees. (Master's thesis), Kent State University.
22. Weingand, D. E. (1993). Public Library and adult Learner, 8(2), 30-38.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
