Volume 27, Issue 1 (5-2021)
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2021, 27(1): 159-185 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Farhadpoor M R, Hourizadeh A. The Impact of Users’ Perception of Social Responsibility on the Usage of Public Library Services and Resources with the Mediated Role of Perceived Organizational Image. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2021; 27 (1) :159-185
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2197-en.html
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-2197-en.html
Information Science and Knowledge Department, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran. , M.farhadpoor@gmail.com
Abstract: (2482 Views)
Purpose: Every organization’s commitment to its social responsibilities is a way to form a positive mental image among its audience that can affect their attitude towards using of the organization’s services. In the present era, despite the various media with diverse capabilities in the field of providing and disseminating of information, the field of information is experiencing intense competition, and this competition has affected the survival of libraries as a cultural institution with a long history. Therefore, public libraries need to take on social responsibilities to ensure their survival. Accordingly, the present study seeks to determine the impact of users’ perceptions of social responsibility on usage of public library services and resources usage through the perceived organizational image.
Method: This is an applied research that was conducted by using a survey-correlation method with a causal approach. The study population consisted of 119,409 members of Khuzestan public libraries, 383 samples of whom were selected by stratified sampling. Data were collected using a 40-item questionnaire in a five-point Likert scale based on the previous studies such as Becker-Olsen, Cudmore and Hill (2006) and Perez and Torres (2017) and a researcher-made one based on Kamali (2019) research for the usage rate section. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using the composite reliability coefficient of Dillon-Goldstein (CR) average variance extracted (AVE) and Cronbach’s alpha and its divergent validity was determined by the HTMT matrix method and the average variance extracted (AVE) measure. After distributing the questionnaires, 345 items (return rate = 90%) were returned and then the data analysis was performed using SPSS25 and Smart-PLS3 software.
Findings: The results showed that the level of research variables is higher than the theoretical average (3), which is relatively desirable (mean of the users’ perception of social responsibility = 4.02, mean of use services and resources = 3.4, and mean of the perceived organizational image = 3.89). Furthermore, the impact of users’ perception of social responsibility on the usage of public library services and resources (T-Value = 2.945) and perceived organizational image (T-Value = 25.407) is significant at a lower level than 0.05.
Originality/value: The findings of the study showed that the more users understand the social responsibility of public libraries, the more they use the services and information resources of libraries. In addition, the adherence of libraries to social responsibility also led to the formation of a constructive and positive image. For this reason, the studied variables can be taken into account by policy makers and managers in developing organizational strategies.
Method: This is an applied research that was conducted by using a survey-correlation method with a causal approach. The study population consisted of 119,409 members of Khuzestan public libraries, 383 samples of whom were selected by stratified sampling. Data were collected using a 40-item questionnaire in a five-point Likert scale based on the previous studies such as Becker-Olsen, Cudmore and Hill (2006) and Perez and Torres (2017) and a researcher-made one based on Kamali (2019) research for the usage rate section. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using the composite reliability coefficient of Dillon-Goldstein (CR) average variance extracted (AVE) and Cronbach’s alpha and its divergent validity was determined by the HTMT matrix method and the average variance extracted (AVE) measure. After distributing the questionnaires, 345 items (return rate = 90%) were returned and then the data analysis was performed using SPSS25 and Smart-PLS3 software.
Findings: The results showed that the level of research variables is higher than the theoretical average (3), which is relatively desirable (mean of the users’ perception of social responsibility = 4.02, mean of use services and resources = 3.4, and mean of the perceived organizational image = 3.89). Furthermore, the impact of users’ perception of social responsibility on the usage of public library services and resources (T-Value = 2.945) and perceived organizational image (T-Value = 25.407) is significant at a lower level than 0.05.
Originality/value: The findings of the study showed that the more users understand the social responsibility of public libraries, the more they use the services and information resources of libraries. In addition, the adherence of libraries to social responsibility also led to the formation of a constructive and positive image. For this reason, the studied variables can be taken into account by policy makers and managers in developing organizational strategies.
Keywords: Public Libraries, Social Responsibility, Organizational Image, Library Services, Information Resources.
Type of Study: quantitative |
Subject:
Libraries Services for Promoting Families and Culture
Received: 2020/04/24 | Accepted: 2020/07/1 | Published: 2021/05/31
Received: 2020/04/24 | Accepted: 2020/07/1 | Published: 2021/05/31
References
1. Agudelo, M. A. L., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1-23. [DOI:10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y]
2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057-1086. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0149206317691575 [DOI:10.1177/0149206317691575]
3. Alvim, L., & Calixto, J. A. (2013). The social function of the public library in the world of social networks and of the crisis of the Welfare State. 5th International Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries 4-7 June 2013, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
4. Anasi, S. N. I. (2010). Curbing youth restiveness in Nigeria: the role of information and libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, 388, 1-7.
5. Anglada, L. (2014). Are libraries sustainable in a world of free, networked, digital information? El profesional de la información, 23(6), 603-611. http://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.nov.07. [DOI:10.3145/epi.2014.nov.07]
6. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of business research, 59(1), 46-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001]
7. Bonner, C. (1997). Image is all: Deregulation, restructuring and reputation in the natural gas industry. American Gas, 79(8), 38-40.
8. Booth, J. (1993). The library's image: Does your library have you appeal? Library management, 14(2), 11-14. http://doi.org/10.1108/01435129310026111 [DOI:10.1108/01435129310026111]
9. Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research in information seeking, needs, and behavior. Academic Press.
10. Coker, S. (1993). Libraries versus users? How and how not to deter library users. Library management, 14(2), 24-31. [DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000000844]
11. Das, K. C. (2013). Imbibing public libraries and corporate social responsibility to promote rural development. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(1), 11-16. [DOI:10.14429/djlit.33.1.3723]
12. Doucett, E. (2008). Creating your library brand: Communicating your relevance and value to your patrons. American Library Association.
13. Esterhamian, M., & Fadaie, G. (2010). Investigating the status of public libraries in Sanandaj city: Providing services and information retrieval tools. Research on Information Science & Public Libraries, 16(1), 85-99
14. Farhadpoor, M. R., & Kalhori, K. (2018). Investigation of the effective factors on unwillingness of the adolescents and youth from public libraries' services. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2112.
15. Feather, J. and Strugges, P. (2003). International encyclopedia of information and library science. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203403303]
16. Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Ferran-Ferrer, N., Nieto-Arroyo, J., & Fenoll, C. (2018). The public library as seen by the non-users. El profesional de la información, 27(3), 659-670.
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.may.19 [DOI:10.3145/epi.2018.may.19.]
17. Fleming, P., Roberts, J., & Garsten, C. (2013). In search of corporate social responsibility: Introduction to special issue. Organization, 20(3), 337-348. [DOI:10.1177/1350508413479581]
18. Green, T. (1994). Images and perceptions as barriers to the use of library staff and services. New library world, 95(7), 19-24. http://doi.org/10.1108/03074809410070520. [DOI:10.1108/03074809410070520]
19. Hauke, P. (2017). Green Libraries towards green sustainable development: Best practice examples from IFLA green library award. 2016-2019.
20. International Federation of Library Association and Organizations (IFLA). (2001). The public library service: IFLA/UNESCO guidelines for development. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s8/proj/pub197.pdf.
21. Johnson, P. (1994). The book way to literacy. Reading, 28(3), 33-42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9345.1994.tb00125.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9345.1994.tb00125.x]
22. Kazingizi, S. (2017). The role of public libraries in promoting corporate social responsibility by small and medium enterprises (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa). CORE. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/129899156.pdf
23. Knox, E. J., & Oltmann, S. M. (2018). Social responsibility, librarianship, and the ALA: The 2015 banned books week poster controversy. The Library Quarterly, 88(1), 5-22. [DOI:10.1086/694870]
24. Kowalczyk, R., & Kucharska, W. (2020). Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders' pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish-German cross‐country study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 595-615. [DOI:10.1002/csr.1823]
25. Krolak, L. (2005). Role of libraries in the creation of literate environments. Background paper prepared for the education for all global monitoring report 2006: Literacy for Life. UNESCO. http://www.ifla .org/files/assets/literacy-and-reading/publications/roleof-libraries-in-creation-of-literate-environments.pdf
26. Lee, H., & Lee, S. H. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on long-term relationships in the business-to-business market. Sustainability, 11(19), 1-12. [DOI:10.3390/su11195377]
27. Levien, R. E. (2011). Confronting the future: Strategic visions for the 21st public library. American Library Association, Office for Information Technology. Policy brief, 4. http://www.foresightfordevelopment.org/sobipro/downloadfile/46-463/54
28. Maruf, A. A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and corporate image. Transnational Journal of Science and Technology, 3(8), 29-49.
29. McCarthy, G. (1994). Getting to know your non-users. Library management, 15(4), 30-34. http://doi.org/10.1108/01435129410060338. [DOI:10.1108/01435129410060338]
30. Mnkeni-Saurombe, N., & Zimu N. (2015) Towards tackling inequalities in South Africa: the role of community libraries. Information Development, 31(1), 40-52. [DOI:10.1177/0266666913501681]
31. Mugwisi, T., Jiyane, G. V., & Fombad, M. C. (2018). Public libraries as facilitators of information services: A case study of selected libraries in KwaZulu-Natal. Information Development, 34(1), 31-43. [DOI:10.1177/0266666916672718]
32. Murali Dhar, D., Krishna Rao, P., & Vijaya Lakshmi, K. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and social development through public libraries. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Libraries: Building a Sustainable Knowledge Society (pp. 13- 24), V. Venkatappaiah, M. Koteswara Rao & D. Murali Dhar (Eds.). New Delhi: Allied Publishers PVT. Ltd.
33. Nave, A., & Ferreira, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility strategies: Past research and future challenges. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 885-901. [DOI:10.1002/csr.1729]
34. Perez, J. P., & Torres, E. M. (2017). Evaluation of the organizational image of a university in a higher education institution. Contaduría y administración, 62(1), 123-140. [DOI:10.1016/j.cya.2016.01.007]
35. Quick, S., Prior, G., Toombs, B., Taylor, L., & Currenti, R. (2013). Cross-European survey to measure users' perceptions of the benefits of ICT in public libraries. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://goo.gl/fwUzTv.
36. Sharma, A. K., Majumder, A., & Uraon, A. (2017). Branding and Marketing your Library and Services: Case study of Rabindra Library. In First International Conference on Transforming Libraries: Proceedings. Guwahati (pp. 145-151).
37. Smith, R. E. (2011). Defining corporate social responsibility: A systems approach for socially responsible capitalism [Master's thesis, University of Pennsylvania].
38. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=od_theses_mp
39. Suharso, P., Yanto, A. Saeful Rohman, A., Wiratningsih, R., & Setiawan Saefullah, R. (2018). Corporate social responsibility through the library for educational facilities. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 74, p. 08011). EDP Sciences. [DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/20187408011]
40. Tag, X., & Hawley, J. M. (2009). Measuring customer-based brand equity: Empirical evidence from the sportswear market in china. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 18(4), 262-271. [DOI:10.1108/10610420910972783]
41. Vassilakaki, E., & Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V. (2014). Identifying the prevailing images in library and information science profession: is the landscape changing? New library world, 115(7/8), 355-375. http://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-03-2014-0029. [DOI:10.1108/NLW-03-2014-0029]
42. Vijesh, P. V., & Mohanan, N. (2018). Social responsibilities of academic libraries: Rajagiri College of Social Sciences Library, Kalamassery, Kerala, A Case Study. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vijesh_P_V /publication/326929711_Social_Responsibilities_of_Academic_Libraries/links/5b72b483299bf14c6da1a54b/Social-Responsibilities-of-Academic-Libraries.pdf.
43. Zulfiqar, S., Sadaf, R., Popp, J., Vveinhardt, J., & Máté, D. (2019). An examination of corporate social responsibility and employee behavior: The case of Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(13), 3515. [DOI:10.3390/su11133515]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
