Volume 24, Issue 1 (5-2018)
Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2018, 24(1): 149-167 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Utilization of social networks by public library users in the city of Tonekabon. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 2018; 24 (1) :149-167
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-1582-en.html
URL: http://publij.ir/article-1-1582-en.html
Abstract: (8810 Views)
Purpose: To investigate the use of social networks by users of public libraries Tonekabon in order to design tailored services to the community.
Methodology: Stratified sampling was carried out to select a sample of 234 respondents. Data was collected using a questionnaire. Analysis used descriptive and inferential statistics. Statistical tests such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Friedman and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to verify findings.
Findings: The group of social network sites with an average of 6/57 were used the most. Books and reading group with an average of 5.24 were used the least. Facebook, with an average of 2/68, web-mobile and Telegram with an average of 3.88, the group of Multimedia, Skype with an average of 2/32, and among books and reading tools, Reader Professional Network with the average 2/45 were used more.
Originality/ Value: The value of the present article is informing public librarians about the use of the variety of social network tools, and showing their popularity
Methodology: Stratified sampling was carried out to select a sample of 234 respondents. Data was collected using a questionnaire. Analysis used descriptive and inferential statistics. Statistical tests such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Friedman and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to verify findings.
Findings: The group of social network sites with an average of 6/57 were used the most. Books and reading group with an average of 5.24 were used the least. Facebook, with an average of 2/68, web-mobile and Telegram with an average of 3.88, the group of Multimedia, Skype with an average of 2/32, and among books and reading tools, Reader Professional Network with the average 2/45 were used more.
Originality/ Value: The value of the present article is informing public librarians about the use of the variety of social network tools, and showing their popularity
Type of Study: quantitative |
Received: 2016/04/3 | Accepted: 2017/12/19 | Published: 2017/12/19
Received: 2016/04/3 | Accepted: 2017/12/19 | Published: 2017/12/19
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
